🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs LSG, 23rd Match,Bengalaru 15 Apr 7:30pm IST🏏
MEHER's DEATH 15.4
Karan Johar meets Anne Hathaway and Meryl Streep
Beautiful song; track of the year is here
IPL 2026: MI vs Punjab, 24th Match, Mumbai, 16th April 7:30pm IST🏏
Originally posted by: Brishti_Sarkar
Very interesting topic. I wonder how come Bhagat Singh and Khudiram Bose are considered as freedom fighters when people like Osama and the Pakistani terrorists are considered terrorists? This has no logic. It is for the same reason I feel Netaji's points were not that good where as Gandhi Ji said things which worked. It is not always power which works but there is something called the brain which is the most powerful weapon of man.
For me, I feel the violent freedom fighters are not actually freedom fighters but they are the ones whom I don't support at all. Storming of the Writer's building was not correct. Dandi March was. What good would killing of British officers do? It is not any good they did not the country but only their name would be remembered. Maybe for the wrong reason. If such freedom fighters can be called freedom fighters I don't think the Pakistani terrorists, the people of Darjeeling who want to be recognized as another state called Gorkhaland are no different than them. But since I consider the Pakistanis in Kashmir, Osama BIn terrorists, I would say Bhagat Singh,Khudiram Bose etc, are no different.
People who actually work for the good of the country are the real freedom fighters. People who fight for their country to bring about a change, and get power in their hands by not shooting people for no reason are the real freedom fighters and heroes.