What Nonsense !!!! - Page 3

well, whatever the reason is
but I like Parties 😈 and I'm hoping that there will be a cute scene of Aadi-Matheli in the party
so let's see ..... what happens... but in case if there is no Aadi... then definately i'm not gonna like this party and then i will join you agian to swear rajeshwari 😉

man i im so with you why doesn't paro kick her out but i guess its true its only to drag the series anywayz if rajo got kicked out who would be the next bad lady?pam mayb?

Originally posted by: ganeshubha

This is the most ridiculous thing that can happen anywhere.. the Rajeshwari's idiotic moves !!! how could one get into somebody's home, stay there forever without thier likes and top of that do all such filthy things...She has totally no right to organise parties in parvati's house and that too against her itself !! and this parvati,why is she not kicking her out of the house like trishna??? This is quite absurd n impossible !!!! what do u think guyz, why is parvati not kicking her out of the house, may be to drag the serial ???

Originally posted by: eklayvafan1

I am Sorry Winnie but I totally disagree....

Firstly I think is illogical and to be relatively frank pathetic that Paro is even tolerating Rajo, and it was high time she kicked her out. I mean what possible reason that Paro would tolerate Rajo, who she knows is linked with two cold murderers, one who was her beloved husband, and the other whom she considered her own son. The two people that meant the world to her have been taken away from her, by this woman be it directly or indirectly. Moreover how Paro cannot consider Rajo bad, even when she is linked to these two murders is pure stupidity. Paro very well knows that from the beginning Rajo is linked with these murders, so her not knowing that actually Rajo was the one who killed Krishna, is no justification for her not kicking Rajo out the AG mansion. The writers have messed up the storyline big time, by keeping Rajo there. It's very fine to say she is entertaining, which she is, but every actor has his/her significance to the plot, where Rajo's stay in the AG makes no sense wotsoever.

Secondly, why should Paro tolerate Rajo just in name of Mehra's grandchildren or there so-called friendship. To keep Mehra content or for his happiness, should Paro forget that her Om and Krishna were murdered by his wife??? Both Trishna/Rajo killed Om, and Rajo went on to kill Krishna, and Rajo happens to be Mehra's wife which is a fact. I know he isn't involved but his wife has taken away Paro's two precious people, whom were her happiness and surrounded her world of love. So why should Paro overshadow her happiness just because in the name that he helped her a lot blah blah, it was entirely Mehra's own choice in helping Paro. Therefore Paro should not have to compensate his help, by tolerating Rajo. Paro who could not even hear a word against Om or Krishna is now been projected to tolerate there murderer's sounds pathetic. And if Paro can prevent Pallavi in taking Chotu with her, and be really insensitive and unsympathetic with her situation, who isn't even a murderer, then why should Paro abide Rajo's stay in her house.

I am totally disgusted with Rajo's stay in the AG mansion, and how Paro's character has been projected differently with both Rajo and Pallavi. If Mehra wants to do something good for Paro, then he should pack his bags and take himself, Rajo, his kids, grandchildren distantly away from the AG mansion, to there own house. So Paro can straighten up Pallavi's/Chotu's situation more sensitively.

Hi Urooj.😊 How are you yaar? Well, we are back to doing what we do best... 😉completely disagreeing with each other...😆 really, really sorry but totally disagree with what u have said here... Well, firstly when it comes to Rajeshwari being a killer... I'm absolutely convinced that Parvati has no idea that Rajeshwari was involved in the murders of Om and Krishna... coz she has punished Trashna and brilliantly so for the killings...👏 the only proof that Rajeshwari was involved in Om's murder was that CD... and unfortunately, Parvati never got to watch that CD coz Trashna destroyed it... and when Trashna told Parvati about Om's killing, she painted a picture of only herself being Om's killer... remember she tells Parvati that I KILLED Om coz he betrayed me and lied to me all my life...😉 I don't recall her ever taking Rajeshwari's name... as for Krishna... well, Parvati had never seen who shot Krishna... she's definitely assumed that Trashna killed him coz he was about to expose her... all she knows about Rajeshwari is that she faked Rano's identity and came to live in Agarwal house... and that she has always been Trashna's best friend and supporter... but just being Trashna's best friend doesn't make her a criminal in Parvati's eyes, does it??? Parvati hates Rajeshwari coz maybe she knows that Rajeshwari is the one who had tried to harm her pre-leap and also always tried to harm the Agarwal family along with Trashna... I'm 100% sure that Parvati isn't aware that Rajeshwari is a killer or I can't imagine Parvati tolerating her for a second or not attempting to expose her. Same with Pallavi...😃 she too doesn't know Rajeshwari's truth or she'd just kill her over Krishna...😃 Now coming to Suyash... I'm sorry yaar, that u still think that this is a 'so-called friendship'... truly, I'm absolutely shocked if u still don't believe that Suyash is Parvati's true friend... I'm not even going to touch upon this coz its pointless... As for Parvati doing things to 'repay' Suyash for his help or to 'compensate for his help'... well, to be honest, Parvati-Suyash's relationship is such that they don't need to do things to 'repay' each other and neither do they count 'debts' when they do something for each other...😃 do u really think that Suyash could ever want Parvati to 'repay' him in any way for anything he has done for her? Parvati and Suyash do things for each other coz they respect each other, hold each other in very, very high regard and care for each other's happiness and well being... 😳and that is the base and the beauty of their friendship...😃 Parvati is doing this for Suyash coz she cares for him... she cares about his happiness and respects his affection for his children... 😳so if those children, who I agree are sick...🤢 want Rajeshwari, their grandmother there, why not??? Its the only thing they are asking from Suyash and Parvati is absolutely right in doing this for him...👏 And regarding what u've said about Suyash doing it out of his own choice... what exactly did that mean yaar?😕 That Suyash should have waited till Parvati came to him and asked him for his help... or not done anything coz Parvati didn't ask him... for me, that fact that he did everything without Parvati's asking or even letting her know about it, just proves that he's a true friend.👏 👏👏And if doing things without being asked is wrong in any way... then u must think about Narayanidevi also in the same way... Parvati didn't ask her for help too but she came to Parvati's rescue like a mother...😳 so if we hold Narayanidevi in such high regard for everything that she has done for Parvati, why measure Suyash with this different yardstick???😕 Why shouldn't Parvati care for his happiness...😳 I think Parvati's reactions to Suyash since she came to know the truth have been absolutely brilliant... 👏👏👏can't see one thing wrong with what she has done... Its not like Parvati is keeping Rajeshwari and those kids there and tolerating their nonsense... she keeps them in their proper place and gives back as good as she gets...👏 👏👏 As for Parvati allowing Pallavi to take Chotu... if u saw ur child with an old enemy of yours whose held that child in handcuffs and locked him in an empty, dark room... and then that child shows u his bruises from merciless beatings... will u allow that woman to come and take him back??? Parvati and 'insensitive and unsympathetic'... that's truly like saying the sun rose from the West this morning...I'm sorry yaar, just can't agree with u... yeah, we can sympathise with Pallavi coz she appears to be so concerned about Chotu... but look at it just once from Parvati's point of view... And yeah, as of today... I'm sure Parvati thinks Rajeshwari hates her coz Parvati believes that Rajeshwari thinks that Parvati 'snatched' Suyash and her children away from her... about her being a killer... as far as I can remember, Parvati hasn't ever had a hint about it... so she lets her stay in Agarwal house for those grandkids... yeah, they are as sick as Rajeshwari is🤢 but they are related to Suyash... and coming to ur point of Suyash packing his bags and going out of Agarwal house and back home... Parvati has proved herself Mrs. Suyash Mehra... she will have to accompany him too... do u wanna see that happening??? Suyash is staying in Agarwal house only so that Parvati doesn't have to stay away from her family😳 and both of them are fully aware and so is Rajeshwari about the truth of their relationship... blaming Parvati and Suyash for not doing something, they don't know about... sorry yaar, can't agree with u. Apologies if any of my views were offensive yaar... 😃Take care, bye.😃

Originally posted by: psawyer

^I agree with Urooj. Paro can repay Suyash in other ways. As it is, she is less than kind to his grandkids, and it is justified, the way they have treated Chotu and the rest of the family. But now, Rajo and, in my opinion, Pranay too, have no reason to stay in that house. Pranay may have 500 crores, but Paro has the house. And I for one can't understand why Suyash and Paro both aren't doing something to legally take the property back. Only they know that their marriage is a lie - so why haven't they yet tricked Rajo into signing over the papers back and making the property swap legal?

And whether she held a gun or not, she was still involved with both murders - that should be reason enough for Paro to not tolerate her. I think the writers have just decided to have the entire world camped out in AG House, just so they can avoid paying extra for different sets. I wouldn't be surprised if Pallavi and the entire Nanda family pack their bags and head to AG House soon too, I'm sure Paro has a few hundred other rooms just hidden away in that mansion 😆

Hi Vasu. 😊How are you yaar? Well, once again, I beg to disagree with u yaar...😳 I've put forward all my reasons in my reply to Urooj's post... but yes, I'd like to repeat one line here...😃 Parvati and Suyash's relationship is such that Parvati does not have to 'repay' Suyash for anything he has done for her... Suyash hasn't done all this for Parvati coz he wants to hold her in his 'debt'... he has done all this coz he cares for her, respects her and wants to see her happy... and so does Parvati... so if she allows Rajeshwari to stay there for his kids...I can't see anything wrong with it...😃 surely knowing here, she believes that Rajeshwari wasn't involved in the killings... yes, she was Trashna's biggest supporter but that doesn't make her a killer in Parvati's eyes coz Parvati has no clue about who killed Krishna and she truly believes that Om was killed by Trashna over the entire jealousy issue...and as I said, keeping them there doesn't mean that Parvati grovels at their feet... she teaches them good lessons when its needed...👏👏👏 they are the ones grovelling...😆 for me, I'm enjoying it,😃 sorry if anything I said is offensive in any way yaar...😃 Take care, bye.😃

But Winnie - rememeber when Janki and Parvati-bhoot were scaring Trishna, she had someone reenact the murder of Om, and there were TWO women who hit "Om" over the head (signifying Trishna and Rajo), and she said "You and Rajo together killed my Om". How can you say that she doesn't have the *slightest* idea, after that, that Rajo was involved? She must have had some idea of Rajo's involvement if she could re-enact the murder scene so accurately, whether she watched the CD or not...

As far as repaying Suyash, if she's not keeping Rajo in the house to "repay" him, then what other reason is there? Why can't Rajo take her grandkids and move back home - its not as if Paro will be throwing them out on the street - they DO have a home. And the kids can decide whether they would rather stay with Suyash dadu or Rajo dadi. Whether they know or not that their dadi is a mean person, surely they know that she is not "Suyash's wife" anymore (acc. to Paro and Suyash), so the whole issue of them staying with them is anyways moot.

Originally posted by: psawyer

But Winnie - rememeber when Janki and Parvati-bhoot were scaring Trishna, she had someone reenact the murder of Om, and there were TWO women who hit "Om" over the head (signifying Trishna and Rajo), and she said "You and Rajo together killed my Om". How can you say that she doesn't have the *slightest* idea, after that, that Rajo was involved? She must have had some idea of Rajo's involvement if she could re-enact the murder scene so accurately, whether she watched the CD or not...

As far as repaying Suyash, if she's not keeping Rajo in the house to "repay" him, then what other reason is there? Why can't Rajo take her grandkids and move back home - its not as if Paro will be throwing them out on the street - they DO have a home. And the kids can decide whether they would rather stay with Suyash dadu or Rajo dadi. Whether they know or not that their dadi is a mean person, surely they know that she is not "Suyash's wife" anymore (acc. to Paro and Suyash), so the whole issue of them staying with them is anyways moot.

Well, frankly yaar... 😉when that 'aatma' bit took place, I remember we were all surprised... 😆coz all of us were sure that Parvati had never seen that cd...😉and she hadn't for sure coz they had shown Trashna destroying it. Remember Parvati running down with lil baby Pragati in her arms when the lights went off and Trashna going in and destroying the cd!!! Why they showed that, I don't know, I think it was an error...😉 And I'm sure that Parvati can't know that Rajeshwari killed Om... or she'd never have thrown her into the asylum, she'd have got her jailed along with Trashna...👏 coz at that point in time, Rajeshwari was so scared of Parvati's 'aatma' that she would have even confessed to the killing...😉but Parvati didn't make her confess coz she herself didn't know about it...😭 plus the second Trashna confessed, both parties would be indicated in the crime but Parvati never followed up against Rajeshwari coz I'm sure she didn't know about her involvement...😭 maybe when they showed that bit, they didn't realise that Parvati had never seen the CD...and it was a huge error that the whole death scene was re-enacted.😉 Coz if Parvati knew that Rajeshwari was a killer, I'm certain that she would do more than she has done in the past or is doing now against her... 😃Parvati treats Rajeshwari more as an irratant in her life😆 than someone who she seriously believes has done something as horrifying as killing Parvati's husband and son. Coz yaar, if Parvati knew that Rajeshwari was Krishna's killer... do u think she wouldn't tell Pallavi?😃 Ok, so Pallavi and she are not best friends but when it came to Krishna... there was no doubt that they were both his mothers...😳 do u think Parvati would keep Pallavi in the dark about such a big thing?😃 Actually honestly, I don't think Parvati and Suyash know about it... coz Suyash stayed with Rajeshwari for 18 years... 😉yeah, he hated her every minute coz she was the one who attacked Parvati and blackmailed him...but I think he assumed it was coz of Parvati's and his relationship at the time... or maybe he felt she did it to protect Trashna from being exposed... but I don't think even he believes she's a killer. Actually yaar, pre-leap, things were just a lil confused... 😉but as the picture stands today, I'm sure Parvati doesn't know the truth. 😃

As far as Suyash goes...😉 well, for whatever reason Parvati is doing it... I'm convinced its not to 'repay' Suyash... 😃for starters, Parvati knows for a fact that Suyash doesn't want her to do anything that will hurt her personally... in fact, if Suyash thought for even a second that Parvati is doing all this to 'repay' him, he'd be the first one to tell her not to do any such thing.😳 The fact is that Suyash spent 18 years of his life with a creep like Rajeshwari for his children. Parvati knows what his kids mean to him... 😳that is why she doesn't want him to be separated from him so they are all in Agarwal house... and they want their Dadi there too...so Parvati has kept quiet. True, she could tell those loser children🤢 to make a choice... Suyash wouldn't even dream of stopping her but she is aware of what those kids, no matter how horrid they are🤢 mean to him... she is not doing this to 'repay' him, she is doing it coz she cares about him and his happiness... 😳at least in my opinion, not even for a second do I believe that Parvati is doing anything wrong...👏👏👏 She is just proving that she is every bit as good a friend😳 as Suyash is to her... 😳and between friends... where do 'favours', 'debts' and 'repayments' arise yaar? 😳 And Parvati-Suyash...😳their's is a more than special friendship...😳 Parvati had done so much to Suyash under that misunderstanding...😭but even then, she knew she didn't need to apologise to him...😳 that silent sorry was enough...😳 and that's why I love Parvati-Suyash sooo much... 😳their trust, faith and understanding is just beautiful to watch...😳Parvati and have to 'repay' Suyash yaar...never...😳

this is nonsense
ekta will make anythin in her serials