The makers of Kalki 2 takes a not-so-subtle dig at Deepika
BATWARA - 1st Look - Sunny Deol, Aamir Khan
Will you watch Alpha in cinemas?
Bollywood Congratulates PM MODI
Member Topic - Khud ko kya samajhti/ta hai
Happy Birthday to our beloved Madhu di (Viswasruti)
India A vs Afghanistan A, 2nd Match, Tri Nation A Series in SL, 2026
I agree if they cant bring Anjum, better Gauri's character dont back.Originally posted by: Missesha
Really? Why do they need to re introduce Gauri if they can't bring Anjum.
If it was Anjum it would have been fun to watch G1, but once again trying to adjust to a new face??CVs don't you think we gave had enough with respect to replacements.When we badly wanted to see how G's story ended you left the audience hanging and now when we have moved on, the character is re- introduced on a new face? What for?If the above news is any true then its s bad move frim Cvs.
Originally posted by: Missesha
The gap has been way too long to suddenly accept the character with replacement.
G's absence was felt for a long time because the story ended abruptly. Then one fine day J moved on and married ganga and is now settled.
In this way audience also moved on. I also felt Ja ga should have been closed well. But now even if G1 comes back how are we going to connect it to Ja Ga with this new face after such a long break? And what's the point of reintroducing the character on a new face, when there was a huge disonnectivity.
Let's see what unfolds because I am disappointed with the news.
It should either have been replacement back then or Anjum now. But replacement now, doesn't make sense.