What Was Parth Kashyap Trying To Say Exactly? -_-'

SwetaRocking123 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
Okay. So, in today's episode, Randhir crossed a line by bringing up Arpita. And Parth Crossed a line too by bringing up Randhir's mother. They are at square one now.
But that is not the point. Actually, I did not get the point. What was Parth trying to say exactly?
"Teri tarah apni mom ke paise nahi Use karta." - He said something like that, right?

I don't get it. What is wrong in using parent's money for education?
And Parth doesnot even know the gravity of Randhir's situationwith his Mother. So, we can rule out the fact that he assumed Renuka won't finance her son's education.

Was he trying to emphasize the fact that Randhir is using his 'MOTHER'S' money? As in a women's wealth? That is chauvinism, right?

If anyone could decipher the point, please be kind enough to let me know.


Regards,

Sweta.
Edited by SwetaRocking - 11 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

30

Views

3k

Users

17

Likes

78

Frequent Posters

spreadingsmile thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
when parth said that ,i wanted to slap him hard ,how dare he. aaa😡😡
and the way he was beating randhir , i dont wat i will do tommoorw 😡
just hope sanyu better give parth reality check . if randhir crossed the line ,even he crossed it ,that too about randhir mom ,😭
yoyoanjali thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
i m saying the same thing girl!!
i too dont understand what is wrong in taking parents money for education!!!
i mean all off us here are using there parents money for education
is it wrong!!!
i mean if i m taking money to pay fees from my mom's salary then i m doing a crime!!!
what utter nonsense is this !!!
this is litterally chauvinism !!!
i was disgusted by this worthless comment !!😡
moonkmh thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
firstly...i dont know why but i dont think RD is living on Renuka's money..atleast not directly. renuka might finance him indirectly but as long as RD is very hard on her i dont think he would accept any help from her. secondly..even if he is using his mother's money whats bloody wrong with that..i lived on my dad's money even now,whats wrong with that?? its a natural thing. if parth is implying that RD is living on a "woman's" money then i think we all need to think about his character again.
luvsandhir thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Yes that is chauvinism!
OK now I get it! All these days the CVs have been copy pasting sandhir scenes on sanyukta and some1 who must not be named! Thn they tried to turn that someone into an angry Young man like randhir by those wall puching scenes( but failed miserably thanks to sum1's superb acting skills) and now finally they are bringing out the MCP in him so that they can replace RD in the tittle track as well! Soon u'll see that some1 and sanyukta Deary in the tittle track with the caption'his story is now her story! 🤢
Supertrouper thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6
Could it b that he is implyngInspite of having issues with his mom neglecting him in childhood, he is ok with using her money? ( no... I m not against randhir or nything and m ok with kids using parents money. It's for the kids only...)
yoyoanjali thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Supertrouper

Could it b that he is implyngInspite of having issues with his mom neglecting him in childhood, he is ok with using her money? ( no... I m not against randhir or nything and m ok with kids using parents money. It's for the kids only...)


this does not sound practical..!!
mishluvsandhir thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8
a new male chauvinist in d making😡
no actually he is one but only pretends to be sweet...
hypocrite
Edited by mishluvsandhir - 11 years ago
mishluvsandhir thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Supertrouper

Could it b that he is implyngInspite of having issues with his mom neglecting him in childhood, he is ok with using her money? ( no... I m not against randhir or nything and m ok with kids using parents money. It's for the kids only...)

well i cant judge it completely but i dnt think he is using her money...remember during d holidays he didnot even visit his house and stayed at the garage...and as he said he didnot go home frm many yrs...so using his mother's money makes no sense over here...may be he is into sum wrking and iving his life with dat money...
--Kkkhushiii-- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#10
First of all Parth nvr made sense to me
But the dialogue he said in precap abt RD using his mom's money went over my head!!
Like wat was he trying to say?? That kids dnt hve right over their parents money??
He can claim his dead gf's money but RD cnt claim his mom's money??
Also I was surprised wen Parth said "meri mehnat ki Kamayi" 🤔
Like seariously??
This guy seariously makes no bloody sense to me!!!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".