Not to forget, we're completely omitting the fact that Bajirao had a son with Kashi before Mastani came. For lord's sake, don't tell me he doesn't care for his son Nanasaheb.
Originally posted by: .-Amethyst-.
^Thanks!
Even I feel so. Mastani's entry looks forced. Bajirao had Nanasaheb with Kashi before she came. How come he's not interested in her? And how heartless it is to say that and feel it! He knows her worth, has appreciated it and yet he doesn't remember her clearly. This is historically incorrect. Kashibai was his friend, His support & his advisor too. Now if Radha is mad at him for it, I'm with her.I too pity Kashi! All for nothing! :(SAD.
Originally posted by: BeyondHorizon
I already dislike Mastani 😆 yes Nana Saheb was already 8-9 yrs old when he met Mastani. How could he beget a son from a woman he never felt anything? Kashi maybe the neglected wife but Baji valued her nonetheless. Kashi is probably an unsung hero in this so called epic love story of Bajirao Mastani who were fortunate enough to die at around the same time but what of the woman who lived with the scars for a long time to come and even raised the son of a woman who snatched away her husband like he was her own? I guess I will happily skip all Mastani scenes.
Originally posted by: .-Amethyst-.
Absolutely. People feel for Mastani but what about the lady who never let down the kul's maryada, suffered quietly and didn't complain. Indeed true, it's difficult to accept another's son and bring him up as her own. It's difficult to live on with haunting memories and yet not say a word.I'll too happily skip Mastani scenes. I never felt like sympathising with her :/
Originally posted by: BeyondHorizon
Neither could I sympathize with Mastani. No matter how great a warrior Bajirao was there is no denying he was a terrible husband. Back then women couldn't even voice out their feelings but ensure it all in silence. I was hoping at least for few epi we will get to see Kashi living a happy life but Mastani is already entering to wreck havoc in her life.
comment:
p_commentcount