Originally posted by: gaurimisha
Kool,
AJits' past shows how good he is at deceiving people.He could hav very well deceived Archana by putting on an act.Was nt it a possibility?Everything u see may nt be the truth always.Agreed Manju was bad.But then she too did and apologise to Sulo.And Vinod was convinced as well.I'm not defending Sulo at all.But trying to understand Archus' POV.If she could give Ajit a chance to prove himself,cudnt she give it to her SIL?Why will she expect negative things on the first look when someone apologises?Her chance bombarded and now she'll get her mother back n give Manju her due.Had Manju really changed...understanding the importance of Ks after those maids left,wudnt it hav been unfair not to give her a chance?Helping her wud mean helping Vinod ,punni n ruchi...wont it?What I'm trying to see is what Archu saw...how was she to understand Manju hasnt changed at all n is planning such crookedness.She read shravani a lot later...by the time she understood reading ppl,Sulo was already suffering at Manjus'.She read shravani as what shravani wanted was what mostly visible in what she demanded.Shravani had earlier wanted her to quit the job.Archu knew her intentions well.How cud hav she read tht Manju had plans of emotionally blackmailing Sulo in the very presence of her bro and make her do all work when Vinod clearly said Sulo is going to rest.Wasnt Archu supposed to show some faith on his bro,as far as Sulo is concerned?I never agreed with Archus' support for Savita.I still hate savita.That was only for her Bhagwan Manav.She actually saw something in Savita which I am yet to see.I'm liking her new found strength.Better late than never.
comment:
p_commentcount