Fact-checking the show - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

41

Views

5.7k

Users

7

Likes

116

Frequent Posters

sambhavami thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 7 years ago
#31

Look at Krishna.

Like you said, Vishnu is up at Vaikuntha, and he's also down here as Krishna. Also, Krishna is in the darbaar of Dwaarka, and he's also always with his 16108 wives. That is the basic point for omnipotence, right? 😉
SriMaatangi thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

The term 'purna avatara' is interesting. It makes one think that Mahalakshmi in all her glory leaves Vaikunta when she incarnates on Earth, but that is not true. Every time an incarnation happens, Mahalakshmi and Maha Vishnu reside in Vaikunta. It is their eternal abode and they never 'leave' it to incarnate on Earth. So while Rama, Sita, Krishna and Radha were all purna avatars, their ultimate forms still resided in Vaikunta.

In fact, I also believe Rukmini and Satyabhama were purna avatars. The ashtabharya were not superior to each other, but Rukmini and Satyabhama are generally held a step above to the rest, mainly because the epics describe them as being complete incarnations, while the other six were ansh. The Bhagavatham describes Rukmini as a purna avatar, while the Mahabharata describes Satyabhama as purna avatar, and thus I believe these two were also equal to Radha in being the purna forms of Mahalakshmi.

There is a stotra that says chanting Rukmini and Satyabhama's name along with Krishna's is equal to chanting all eight of the ashtabharya's name. In fact, Krishna's name should never be chanted alone. One should either chant him with Radha, or Rukmini-Satyabhama.

Doesn't this bring back our concept of Shri in Bhu, Bhu in Shri, and Shri and Bhu together being Sri, along with Nila?
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

Doesn't this bring back our concept of Shri in Bhu, Bhu in Shri, and Shri and Bhu together being Sri, along with Nila?


Yes, which is why I always say it's difficult and unnecessary to divide them up for every avatar. 😉 They're all different forms, but they co-exist in one form which is Mahalakshmi, 1/3 of the tridevi.
SriMaatangi thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#34
I know :P
Harivamsa also calls Satyabhama purna Mahalakshmi also. Rukmini and Satyabhama are purna Mahalakshmis, though they showed more Shri and Bhu than anything else.
NandiniRaizadaa thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#35
Ok so the conclusion is Shree is bhu, bhu is shree and shree and bhu together with Nila make sri who is the eternal consort of Narayan and lives in his heart
SriMaatangi thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: NandiniRaizadaa

Ok so the conclusion is Shree is bhu, bhu is shree and shree and bhu together with Nila make sri who is the eternal consort of Narayan and lives in his heart

Yess. Rather, it is, Shri is Bhu and Nila, Bhu is Shri and Nila, and Nila is Bhu and Shri. So in that way, all three are the same, and intertwined beautifully together. And all three make Sri, who is Mahalakshmi, and verily lives in His heart. She is His heart.
MagadhSundari thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: NandiniRaizadaa


Lola still comes on IF??

I think I have not seen her since years
[/QUOTE
JI HAAN... main hoon khalnaayak 😈😆

Word Count: 0

MagadhSundari thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#38
Sorry to leave you guys hanging so long, things have been crazy busy. I haven't gone to my parents in a while which is where all my texts are, so I can't verify which sources I've seen it in yet (for some reason Garg Samhita rings a bell). The curse/boon was basically akin to the Drona/Drupad situation where he sent his disciples out to conquer his enemy and the Pandavs outdid the Kauravs. Similarly the sons of the Vrishni and Adhak/Bhojas last common ancestor were sent out to subdue one of his rivals, and the one who succeeded won a boon to forever hold the king's role in the Yadav council, and on the flipside the others were "cursed" to never wear the crown. There are also a handful of sources that say each generation determined it by a simple majority, but those were relatively more recent texts.
Edited by MagadhSundari - 7 years ago
guenhwyvar thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#39
Today's episode was the name giving ceremony and once again gives way to the screw ups the show has paved itself.

Per the Krsna Book (which is a summary of Canto 10-11 of the Srimad Bhagavatam:

[quote]After this incident, Vasudeva asked his family priest, Garga Muni, to visit the place of Nanda Mahrja in order to astrologically calculate the future life of Ka. Garga Muni was a great saintly sage who had undergone many austerities and penances and been appointed priest of the Yadu dynasty. When Garga Muni arrived at the home of Nanda Mahrja, Nanda Mahrja was very much pleased to see him and immediately stood up with folded hands and offered his respectful obeisances. He received Garga Muni with the feeling of one who is worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He offered him a nice sitting place, and when he sat down, Nanda Mahrja offered him a warm reception. Addressing him very politely, he said, "My dear brhmaa, your appearance in a householder's place is only to enlighten. We are always engaged in household duties and are forgetting our real duty of self-realization. Your coming to our house is to give us some enlightenment about spiritual life. You have no other purpose in visiting householders. Actually, a saintly person or a brhmaa has no business visiting householders, who are always busy in the matter of dollars and cents. The only reason saintly persons and brhmaas go to the place of a householder is to enlighten him. If it is asked, "Why don't the householders go to a saintly person or a brhmaa for enlightenment? the answer is that householders are very poor-hearted. Generally householders think that engaging in family affairs is their prime duty and that self-realization or enlightenment in spiritual knowledge is secondary. Out of compassion only, saintly persons and brhmaas go to householders' homes.

Nanda Mahrja addressed Garga Muni as one of the great authorities in astrological science. The foretellings of astrological science, such as the occurrence of solar or lunar eclipses, are wonderful calculations, and by this particular science a person can understand the future very clearly. Garga Muni was proficient in this knowledge. By this knowledge one can also understand what his previous activities were that are causing him to enjoy or suffer in this life.

Nanda Mahrja also addressed Garga Muni as "the best of the brhmaas. A brhmaa is one who is expert in the knowledge of the Supreme. Without knowledge of the Supreme Absolute, one cannot be recognized as a brhmaa. The exact word used in this connection is brahma-vidm, which means those who know the Supreme very well. An expert brhmaa is able to give reformatory facilities to the subcastesnamely the katriyas and vaiyas. The dras observe no reformatory performances. The brhmaa is considered to be the spiritual master or priest for the katriya and vaiya. Nanda Mahrja happened to be a vaiya, and he accepted Garga Muni as a first-class brhmaa. He therefore offered his two foster sonsnamely Ka and Balarmato him to purify. Nanda stated that not only these boys but all human beings just after birth should accept a qualified brhmaa as spiritual master.

Upon this request, Garga Muni replied, "Vasudeva has sent me to see to the reformatory performances of these boys, especially Ka's, but if I do so it may incidentally appear that Ka is the son of Devak, since I am Vasudeva's family priest. By his astrological calculation, Garga Muni could understand that Ka was the son of Devak, which Nanda did not know. Indirectly Garga Muni said that Ka and Balarma were both sons of Vasudeva. Balarma was known as the son of Vasudeva because His mother, Rohi, was present there, but Nanda Mahrja did not know about Ka. Garga Muni indirectly disclosed the fact that Ka was the son of Devak. Garga Muni also warned Nanda Mahrja that if he would perform the reformatory ceremony, then Kasa, who was naturally very sinful, would understand that Ka was the son of Devak and Vasudeva. According to astrological calculation, Devak could not have a female child, although everyone thought that the eighth child of Devak was female. In this way Garga Muni intimated to Nanda Mahrja that the female child was born of Yaod and that Ka was born of Devak and they were exchanged. Also, the female child, Durg, had informed Kasa that the child who would kill him was already born somewhere else. Garga Muni stated, "If I give your child a name and if He fulfills the prophecy of the female child to Kasa, then it may be that the sinful demon will come and kill this child also after the name-giving ceremony. But I do not want to become responsible for all these future calamities.

On hearing the words of Garga Muni, Nanda Mahrja said, "If there is such danger, then it is better not to plan any gorgeous name-giving ceremony. It would be better for you to simply chant the Vedic hymns and perform the purificatory process. We belong to the twice-born caste, and I am taking this opportunity of your presence. So please perform the name-giving ceremony without external pomp. Nanda Mahrja wanted to keep the name-giving ceremony a secret and yet take advantage of Garga Muni's performing the ceremony.

When Garga Muni was so eagerly requested by Nanda Mahrja, he performed the name-giving ceremony as secretly as possible in the cowshed of Nanda Mahrja. He informed Nanda Mahrja that the son of Rohi would be very pleasing to His family members and relatives and therefore would be called Rma. In the future He would be extraordinarily strong and therefore would be called Baladeva. Garga Muni said further, "Because your family and the family of the Yadus are so intimately connected and attracted, His name will also be Sakaraa. This means that Garga Muni awarded three names to the son of Rohinamely Balarma, Sakaraa and Baladeva. But he carefully did not disclose the fact that Balarma had also appeared in the womb of Devak and was subsequently transferred to the womb of Rohi. Ka and Balarma are real brothers, being originally sons of Devak.

Garga Muni then informed Nanda Mahrja, "As far as your son is concerned, this child has taken different bodily complexions in different yugas [millennia]. First of all He assumed the color white, then the color red, and then the color yellow, and now He has assumed the color black. Besides that, He was formerly the son of Vasudeva; therefore His name should be Vsudeva as well as Ka. Some people will call Him Ka, and some will call Him Vsudeva. But one thing you must know: this son has had many, many other names and activities due to His different pastimes.

Garga Muni further hinted to Nanda Mahrja that his son would also be called Giridhr because of His uncommon pastime of lifting Govardhana Hill. Since Garga Muni was an astrologer, he could understand everything past and future, and thus he said, "I know everything about His activities and names, but others do not know. This child will be very pleasing to all the cowherd men and cows. Being very popular in Vndvana, He will be the cause of all good fortune for you. Because of His presence, you will overcome all kinds of material calamities, despite opposing elements.

Garga Muni continued to say, "My dear King of Vraja, in His previous births this child many times protected righteous persons from the hands of rogues and thieves whenever there was political disruption. Your child is so powerful that anyone who will become a devotee of your boy will never be troubled by enemies. Just as demigods are always protected by Lord Viu, the devotees of your child will always be protected by Nryaa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This child will grow in power, beauty, opulencein everythingon the level of Nryaa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore I would advise that you protect Him very carefully so that He may grow without disturbance. In other words, Garga Muni informed Nanda Mahrja that because he was a great devotee of Lord Nryaa, the Lord had given Nanda a son equal to Him. At the same time, Garga Muni indicated that this son would be disturbed by so many demons and that Nanda should therefore be careful and protect Him. In this way, Garga Muni convinced Nanda Mahrja that Nryaa Himself had become his son. In various ways he described the transcendental qualities of his son. After giving this information, Garga Muni returned to his home. Nanda Mahrja began to think of himself as the most fortunate person, and he was very satisfied to receive such a benediction in this way.[/quote]

guenhwyvar thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#40
Has anyone heard the Ravan - Devtas - Peacocks story?
From today's WU--
Meanwhile, back in Gokul, Puranmasi narrates the story of how peacocks gave shelter to the devtas in Treta Yuga when Ravana defeated them all and was going to kill them. Devtas were given shelter in the peacock feathers, and so they blessed the peacocks that the devtas will always reside in the peacock feathers. Hence ... why peacock feathers have those eyes.

Edited by guenhwyvar - 7 years ago
Top