@Rollingstones I am actually confused about the people dying in the hospital. Did they or did they not? Because the top cop said there were no civilian casualties in the hospital or were those early reports and they still need to learn about the deaths? Because its highly unlikely anyone near to that door which exploded would not suffer fatal injuries. Hoping there will be some clarity on this very soon.
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@Aahana I agree to you on resemblance. That's why I am also looking at. If by any chance they show India had anything to do with Peshawar attack I am off. Because I had seen enough of so called secular media which like to glorify so many things which I dont want to mention.
Change that is what I want to see. What changed Sid to Sadiq, will they show that part. What can change Afreen to India. I am looking keenly at the script. hypocrisy dont escape my eyes. If it comes that way, I will be the first to put criticism also.
Originally posted by: RollingStones
Well in the Episode ...there was a scene where dead bodies were shown near the lift after bomb blast Happened .About Commisioner's statement of "No Casualties"...it could be early report of his , but one noticeable thing was , he also says to Vikram "Only One round of firing happened and uska sab shant" .where as in Defense Hospital , It was Bomb blast and then firing .so , I am confused if there are 2 attacks being carried out π .
All I am hoping for is that they don't show some misplaced peace message which resembles our Indian media's darling 20 year old student style. I am all for peace between the two nations but not at the cost of being blind to facts and the reality on the ground. There is no way Sid/Sadiq is escaping this mess so whatever is shown, I hope it will be satisfactory and fills the loopholes. My current sympathies are with Shobha. Whatever the outcome, the woman will be scarred for life.P.S Wonder If our media will give me and my point of view the same kind of importance and coverage as I also happen to be a 20 year old just with a different view from that of Gurmehar's π π
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
In Thadani corp employees came out right. I dont think anyone died there. In hospital there are injured people. Commandos have died.
@Aahana read Nikhil Advani's screenplays especially D-Day. It gives me hope that Nikhil wont mess it up. He has taken similar funda before. See there are many things that makes me keep the card open.- The coin. Sid says Jai has to die. in the movie Sholay that coin of Jai is important. Both sides have same thing.- He says India is the only country where a hindu, muslim and sikh sit together and eat. That is why Pakistani's hate us- His name Siddhant means established truth. That name is not just like that. It has a meaning so he needs to establish the truth- His dialogue to Afreen this place is hell for kids- His breaking the mirror as if he doesnt like his own reflection- His stoping beating a man when Afreen calls him Siddant- His emotions when he knows Afreen is pregnant- His salute to TricolorMost important if he unleashes the terror it is not Shobha who fails, it will be the biggest failure of Vikram and also Iman and Sartaj. Because Vikram had trusted Sid so much to risk everything to bring him across the border. Sartaj trusted his friend to give him coded message so that he escapes Yusuf. Iman send his wife for him because again he trusted Sid.So if anyone innocent dies it is the failure of these 3 guys also in reading Sid. Vik will be proven right that 17 years of torture can change an Indian soldier and he turn against his mother land unleashing terror on innocents.If Siddant doest exist collectively India fails. Our trust on our soldiers fail. A constructive mentor like Vikram loses out to a destructive mentor like Lala.Principles of a nurture that a sister like Shobha shows fails in front of the principles of hatred a woman like Afreen has sown with her love.Sadiq cannot win, Sid has to win. How is the biggest question. How will the conscience be restored is the question? This is where the script matters.Now coming to your view. Your view will be given limelight only if meets the criteria of peace paragonsπ. Age doesnt matter. π. As youth is defined by Gurmehar Kaur for certain people. Everything else is trolls. Only peace paragons has freedom of expression. If someone uses their freedom of expression and questions them then it becomes strangulating freedom of expressionππ
Beautiful post. Hoping with all my heart for a miracle.
But I don't think soldiers dying is a good thing even if there are casualties on the other side because there's a difference between the other side and the side the soldiers belong to. Sid let Jaish terrorists get killed but those were terrorists who oNly wanted destruction. Soldiers are protectors and they get martyred - they have someone like a Naz, Shaira, Salim, Vikram and Shobha waiting for them. The Jaish terrorists also have loved ones but I have zero sympathy for people who support and encourage destruction of a fellow country. And this is why i feel these two sections should not be hyphenated or clubbed together because it draws a false equivalence betweem protectors and destroyers. This is where Gurmeher Kaur erred. She equated India with Pakistan and asked 'both' the countries to stop pretending and stop killing each other and that the war killed her father and not Pakistan. But her father died on the Indian soil, he didn't invade a country, he only was protecting his country from people who wanted to snatch it away from him and Pakistan killed him for that and so many like Gurmeher had to grow up without a father. Hence, I feel soldiers dying is not a good thing even if Sid/Sadiq tries to make it look like it was all for a greater good. If he kills his own soldiers, his buddies as the armed forces like to call their fellow soldiers - I would not be able to forgive him.
comment:
p_commentcount