Confused. Who did Sid shoot exactly?

msnautanki thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#1
Who was the Pakistani guy Sid shot, and threw across the border?

He was an informer for who and how did they find out? πŸ˜•πŸ˜•

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

973

Users

4

Likes

10

Frequent Posters

InsaneDivine thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#2
I didn't understand this either... According to Yusuf he was and Indian spy and according to Vikram he was giving information to Pakistan... πŸ˜• Indian intelligence agencies were searching him.. πŸ˜• So basically who was he ?
1019702 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#3
Watched the Saturday episode again and yes the informer from India used to actually work for Pakistan and was on the list of Intelligence Bureau .

So this means Yousuf libeartely lied to Sadiq to see his reaction . Also Yousuf did see him working for Sadiq in the same episode . So he could have thought to test Sadiq .

Sadiq on the other hand thought to using this to prove his loyalty and at the same time send the message across India .
This is what I feel ,I could be wrong though .

The narration of the show is very point to point.
It's like, they leave it to viewers to connect those points . If we get it it's good else we are left confused πŸ˜† .


peeyara thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: RollingStones

Watched the Saturday episode again and yes the informer from India used to actually work for Pakistan and was on the list of Intelligence Bureau .

So this means Yousuf libeartely lied to Sadiq to see his reaction . Also Yousuf did see him working for Sadiq in the same episode . So he could have thought to test Sadiq .

Sadiq on the other hand thought to using this to prove his loyalty and at the same time send the message across India .
This is what I feel ,I could be wrong though .

The narration of the show is very point to point.
It's like, they leave it to viewers to connect those points . If we get it it's good else we are left confused πŸ˜† .


so i was right :P
I feel Asmi, that man might have been working for both sides πŸ˜†
1019702 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: peeyara

so i was right :P
I feel Asmi, that man might have been working for both sides πŸ˜†


yeah yeah , You were right πŸ€” .
and there is also chance of second possibility ...

see this is what they are doing , leaving so many things for assumptions.
which is good in a way coz it makes us think , but then leave as Confused too... πŸ˜•
peeyara thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: RollingStones


yeah yeah , You were right πŸ€” .
and there is also chance of second possibility ...

see this is what they are doing , leaving so many things for assumptions.
which is good in a way coz it makes us think , but then leave as Confused too... πŸ˜•

yes ur theory too sounds correct πŸ˜†
its like makers want to us put our brain on run and give our imaginations wings to think watever we want n to believe watever we wantπŸ˜†
msnautanki thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#7
Maybe it can be that the makers leave it a little vague so that no organizations (eg. ISI, etc) or people get offended.
Top