Siddhanth is the real deal! | P.O.W. Bandi Yuddh Ke

sehar mehrotra

@sehar mehrotra

Inactive

29

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#1

Hey guys,

So after watching the last two episodes and last nights precap, I reckon its safe to assume that Siddhanth is the real deal, the real "POW Who was Turned".

I've followed Homeland since the start and this was how Brody got turned against his country, Abu Nazir gave him some solace in form of his son, who later died due American bombings and Brody loved that kid.

Here, Sid also gets a friend in that little kid and also some love in the form of the girl. Lala really seems to be playing his cards well by turning Sid against Sartaj and Imaan.

Lets see how the story progresses! 😉

5

Reply

Quote

peeyara

@peeyara

Stunner

37

+ 6

Posted: 7 years ago

#2

story have taken interesting turn and i am excited and intrigued to see how Sid has turned his sides

2

Reply

Quote

shruthiravi

@shruthiravi

Stunner

36

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#3

Has Sid really turned 😆😆. Sid is said to hit the bulls eye always. That point bulls eye was highlighted twice in that wed epi.

Also he says what if Jai doesnt die in Sholay. Jai has to come back. Siddhant Thakur is going to do something, he is a fighter, he is an Indian soldier, I dont think a TV show will show an Indian soldier turning against his own country.

2

Reply

Quote

RapChick101

@RapChick101

Sparkler

30

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#4

Don't know what will eventually be his character, but yes! You got that right. Thaakur boy is the real deal.

Edited by AttractiveAdya - 7 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

peeyara

@peeyara

Stunner

37

+ 6

Posted: 7 years ago

#5

Originally posted by: shruthiravi
Has Sid really turned😆😆. Sid is said to hit the bulls eye always. That point bulls eye was highlighted twice in that wed epi.
Also he says what if Jai doesnt die in Sholay. Jai has to come back. Siddhant Thakur is going to do something, he is a fighter, he is an Indian soldier, I dont think a TV show will show an Indian soldier turning against his own country.

Oh yes how can we ignore that bulls eye symbolism 😆
But if he has not changed sides then wont it be cliched n expected plot?
I wont mind him changing sides...he may again change side from pak to India for sake of sister,

1

Reply

Quote

sehar mehrotra

@sehar mehrotra

Inactive

29

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#6

I too feel it'll be a tad cliched if he's just been playing Lala all along. But you guys are right that there are way too many symbolisms too.

As of yesterday, he still doesn't agree with Lala. He doesn't blame Sartaj Imaan yet and he hasn't forgotten his country yet.