Why are the judges so biased and partial?
I'm not an Amar-Charlie fan- this is the first show I saw Amar in actually. I am not a fan of any of the jodis, I never knew half of them (including Amar charlie) before NB. but A-C definitely are better dancers than their scores reflect. All throughout NB, they were the couple that were treated the worst, most of the times, they deserved more marks than they got. I'm not a regular watcher but every time I watch, the judges frustrate me with the bias in the scoring (especially Sajid Khan). I remember once Rahul-Dimpy got the same score as (or may be more?) than Amar-Charlie when Amar Charlie were clearly FAR better (Rahul Dimpy were one of the worst dancers of the show!!). Why this bad treatment towards Amar Charlie?
Also, Terrence has become so spineless in this show. I love him as a choreographer and he is the only REAL judge of the show but I think he is being suppressed by the "more powerful" celebrities aka Shilpa and Sajid. Terrence never directly dares to disagree with Sajid or say what he really wants to in fear of Sajid, it seems. Like yesterday, the comment about Ravi Sargun performance- he said there are different types of dances (hinting towards sajid's comment obviously) but he stopped and didn't clearly state his POV, he more or less just agrees with the other two even when he doesn't want to or stays mum rather than state a point that contradicts Sajid's point, when clearly, Sajid hasn't an ounce of clue about dancing (or film-making or acting or humour...but that's a different story...) and Terrence should have the upper hand because he is a dancer and choreographer!
HATE HATE HATE all this, NB5 has to be the worst season of all NBs, sadly. 🤢
comment:
p_commentcount