Takshak naags - Page 24

Originally posted by: paridhi02

now i got your point dear... actually. our shlok have a very deep meaning for every phrase. u are talking about the straight meaning of it... our literature is very deep. with that phrase they show some other quality of takshak snakes. i need to take brief look for that... but dear in our shlok even mahadev was addressed as mahakaal... so what u want to say about that...😆😆

paridhi deep meaning and straight meaning there is vast difference for us who read authentic versions 👍🏼 not for everyone dear 😳 ..every line and every phase gives different set of meanings according to the situation and story in mythology 😃 all are interconnected with several joints 😃 even a single thing a single word to be observed in different meaning in different places 👏 is it possible to understand by normal reading 😛 to say random reading 😃 😃 ..

I have provided the Sloka number above. It is 1.18.2.

Originally posted by: vinnas

paridhi deep meaning and straight meaning there is vast difference for us who read authentic versions 👍🏼 not for everyone dear 😳 ..every line and every phase gives different set of meanings according to the situation and story in mythology 😃 all are interconnected with several joints 😃 even a single thing a single word to be observed in different meaning in different places 👏 is it possible to understand by normal reading 😛 to say random reading 😃 😃 ..

even i faced so many difficulties to undestand our mythology. but my mytho expert my grand paa always helped me with my curiosity... thnks to him i have a average undestanding of mythology... because even now i have so many doubts about it...

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

I have provided the Sloka number above. It is 1.18.2.

Now those who are in confusion, can easily open the actual book and see.😉

It sounds so hilarious when people confidently assume that they're the only ones on Planet who have read authentic versions of mythology.

Talking about 'reading authentic sources'.😆😆😆

There is nothing called 'authentic' source when it comes to Hindu mythology. The same story has 10000 versions according to author and timeline.

Shiva Puran describes Kali as having originated from Parvati's genes, but Devi Mahatyam says otherwise.

There is no mention of Brahma as Sarasvati's father in the Rigveda, the most ancient Holy Book of Hinduism, but Vishnu prana describes her as the daughter of Brahma.

These two examples are among those 1000s which go to show that there is nothing called 'authentic origin story' in Hinduism.

But of course, people with limited knowledge claim to know anything and everything. 🤣 So typical. Talking about 'authentic' sources in Hinduism, which ironically display the limitations of their reading and knowledge. 😆

so Wat is actually Saraswathi to Brahma 😳 .?

Originally posted by: paridhi02

even i faced so many difficulties to undestand our mythology. but my mytho expert my grand paa always helped me with my curiosity... thnks to him i have a average undestanding of mythology... because even now i have so many doubts about it...

pari it's daily learning subject dear 😳 every time we learn n many questions arise 😛 but we try to understand by connecting and contacting experts 👏 mythology is not alone subject 😃 it is training 👏 it is training towards humanity 😃 through references of god 👏 ...

Paridhi, what do you think may have been the intention in describing Takshaka as a 'snake bird'? I see no need for it within the context in which it was cited.

Originally posted by: vinnas

so Wat is actually Saraswathi to Brahma 😳 .?

i m sure saraswati is daughter of brahma. because cooking doesn't belongs to goddes saraswati... and only a daughter have the liberty that she dont need to cook... 🤣

Originally posted by: vinnas

so Wat is actually Saraswathi to Brahma 😳 .?

To answer your question, Saraswati has no father if you go by the Vedas. In the Puranas which came mostly during the Gupta age, Saraswati was Brahma's daughter who he married later.

Originally posted by: paridhi02

i m sure saraswati is daughter of brahma. because cooking doesn't belongs to goddes saraswati... and only a daughter have the liberty that she dont need to cook...🤣

ofcourse 😳 I seen her always playing veena 👏 so might be 😉 it's true 😛 😉 ..