Takshak naags - Page 23

Originally posted by: vinnas

in Telugu too it have item song 😳 with same meaning 😉 but magadheera I don't heard it done remake 😉 it taken dubbing in more languages due to its huge success n rajamouli great direction influence 👏 I think that yoddha too dubbed one not remaked 😳 I seen the images in YT 😛 ..yup rajamouli had great influence 😳 n serials only run on various influences only 😛 😆 😉 ..

Originally posted by: Luna99

Chandu,the bong version called yoddha is a remake . It has our superstar actor dev playing ram charan's role.

I really don't like bahubali-so it's very hard nowadays for me to digest those historicals .

Previous shows like prc and cgm were free of bahubali influenced and so I used to like them a lot.

Oh sorry Luna 😳 I may mistaken to witness n I remember that title n image of ramcharan in YT 😉 n in searching too I find his scenes so not seen particular 😳 .oh it's Dev that actor OK will watch it later 😛 .mm bahubhali I like the presentation n frame to frame direction n actors very much 👏 in terms of story I don't like bahubhali 😛 😳 ..

Originally posted by: vinnas

Oh sorry Luna 😳 I may mistaken to witness n I remember that title n image of ramcharan in YT 😉 n in searching too I find his scenes so not seen particular 😳 .oh it's Dev that actor OK will watch it later 😛 .mm bahubhali I like the presentation n frame to frame direction n actors very much 👏 in terms of story I don't like bahubhali 😛 😳 ..

Originally posted by: Luna99

That's right. It's hard for people to criticize bahubali.

But this tv serialwalas try to copy it and then fails.

So it looks like comedy circus.

Btw: here's the Chandrakanta link-https://mobile.twitter.com/rajcheerfull/status/864905739302776832

Watch it and please comment what do you people think about this trailer

Word Count: 1

We're dealing with mytholiogical creatures here. 😆. So it's completely useless to argue whether they exist 'in real' or not.

Originally posted by: paridhi02

we have some shlok and suktiya. which are always OTT. they have lot of things which are not real.. may be she something in them.. but seriously i dont have interest that takshak snakes can fly or not because i cant witness them flying in real so no use for me... 😆😆

Paridhi, I was talking about the mention of flying snakes in Hindu mythology. Srimadbhagbat and Bhagavatam Puran are definitely included with 'mythological' sources, right?

Anybody who needs 'authentic' and 'offline' copies of the Bhagavata Puran can simply put down their residential address, I'll be most happy to mail them a copy. 😆 You could see with your own eyes then.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

Paridhi, I was talking about the mention of flying snakes in Hindu mythology. Srimadbhagbat and Bhagavatam Puran are definitely included with 'mythological' sources, right?

now i got your point dear... actually. our shlok have a very deep meaning for every phrase. u are talking about the straight meaning of it... our literature is very deep. with that phrase they show some other quality of takshak snakes. i need to take brief look for that... but dear in our shlok even mahadev was addressed as mahakaal... so what u want to say about that... 😆😆

There is a confusion between Yama and Shiva when it comes to addressing them as 'Mahakaal' or 'Kaal'.

In the Bhagavat Puran, verse 1.18.2 describes that Raja Parikshit would be attacked by a 'snake-bird', whose bit would cause death.