Wow, that's interesting. I guess when we watch a show everyday and get attached to it, the characters become so real that we forget that they are merely fiction and the actor is only playing a role. I guess that's the reason why a lot of actors don't like to experiment much, especially with negative roles.
And as you rightly said, it again shows what a brilliant actor Kunal is. I'm glad I didn't watch Pratigya earlier. In any case, I don't think I would have liked that show.
You know, I was just thinking - a few days back we all heard that radio interview of Kunal. And I think within ten minutes he had got 3-4 marriage proposals 😆 I wonder now, how many proposals did he get when he was playing Angad? 😉
I would'nt have liked Pratigya either and I am glad I dint watch it, not my kind of show. Reg Kunal, no words to describe his talent, he is an amazing actor and must appreciate his guts while accepting any role be it negative, it only shows his verstality as an actor. Must thank the genius that Sudhir Sharma is, who was the sole reason for casting Kunal as Mohan Bhatnagar, in one of his interviews he had mentioned that nobody in his office supported his decision of casting Kunal and AK for the roles of Mohan and Megha, everybody warned him against casting Kunal as he was an unknown name and thought it would be suicidal for the show, if SS had given in to those negative advices we would not have been able to watch Kunal at all...Hats off to SS.
comment:
p_commentcount