Originally posted by: EstrellaNijam
Ammaji the most realistic character. When she is good, she is good, but when necessary she is bad. Think about Sadhna in Bidaai, Dia in Laado, Anandi in BV, who always walks with the jhanda of truth. They gave testimony against their own family member in court. Do you think these are real characters? No... Ammaji, who accepted daughter child but still discriminate in matter of election is the real character. Ammaji, who wants to change Veerpur but still wins by cheating is real character.
Aditya, he is the most common type of character in real life. More than half of the married couple (majority of whom are men) have extra-marital affair. His concept is the most realistic and I guess most current-time situtaion problem. (even girl feticide/infanticide is outdated most of the places)Chanda, has the common problem of jealousy possed by most of the women in the world. The fear of lack of power, diplomacy, trying to show others low are sommon problem and terrible phobia for women today.Param, well not much, but still unlike her brother, Surya, he has remembered who his father was. He has not forgotten that Ammaji was the one who killed her father, no matter for what reason. If someone kills my father for saving me, I would kill that someone and ask him why he did not save my father first?No, I am not saying they are all right from my POV. But put yourself in their shes. When you will, you will see there is nothing wrong in Ammaji, Chanda and Param at all. These three are right in their own places. Only Aditya is pervert and I appreciate whoever playing his role. He has done sucha a fantastic job by bringing his character real in the show. This is not about how righteous a character is, it is about how well a show was able to portray a real problem and showed its solution.For example, BV shows real-life problem, but gives unrealistic solution. They showed Anandi's sasural as very mahan and good. Why? It is not common. They are showing widows, but men are always ready for them to marry !!!! even if they have child!!!!! One of the answer from a fan of BV/Anandi was that if they show common things in a show, what is the point of watching the show. Anandi sausral is exceptionally good, that's why we are watching Anandi's story, because she is especial.Now my comment is, they are showing such a serious concept like child marriage and widow marriage with special cases (or exceptional situation), where everybody is there to support the victim? Wow👏👏👏. Hats off to the imagination and to the realization of reality of BV CVs team.There is nothing rightoues about Ammaji or Aditya's behavior. But that's where Laado "bajji matt karte hain". It takes a lot of risks and tries to open our eye by portraying such charcaters. they do not show faltu situtaions like BV. Laado has really complicated and tough situtaion. It is not like BV, where Gauri's child had to be killed so that the thorn in the path of Anandi and jaggya can be cleared. (don't talk about Shivaji, I am talking about the time when the miscarriage happened). Life is not so easy. Since, Laado has taken that brave step to show unwanted but realistic solution, we have given Laado a beautiful gift, that is "going off air"BV portion of this post was also intended as the reply to the above sentence.
comment:
p_commentcount