Is Harman's eviction fair?

Last year some contestant didn't complete his/her dish and the judges eliminated the contestant basis that. By that logic Ashish should've been eliminated.

Similarly Meenu's jelly hadn't set and also the Orange flavour wasn't strong enough. While Harmans only problem was the chocolate was grainy.

Do you think Harman's elimination was fair?

The judges keep changing the rules, this time it is the flavor that matter not looks. Unlike masterchef in USA, in masterchef india decisions are most times seem to be made on judges whims, depends on who they want to keep around and not how they have performed.

I can't blv the fact that he was chosen first to be given an apron based on his taste

His eviction was utmost unfair! If someone's dish is incomplete how can he be safe first? How do you know that the rest of the dish would have turned out exactly as it was so far?

Harman's eviction was unfair.

I think it is fair because if u say on the basis of a complete and awsome looking dish ...then harman should not have got in the top 12 in that basis ..and the judges aren't biased..They r just doing what is right . Harman's dish lacked taste maybe that's why they eliminated him (they don't show all the comments of the judges on TV ).though harman xould have stayed longer ,it does not mean that the judges were unfair (my opinion :P)

First of all, I am confused what the chefs actually wanted: presentation, completion or flavour...anyone remembers what they said they focussed for this task...? If only completion of task was focus, clearly eviction was unfair... But if completion is not and flavour is must then ashish being in...I can understand...🥱