In the vein of trolling and as far as jealousy of Krishna's wives goes: there is a story about how they demand to know from him why he hovers around Panchali. The answer is to die for 
if you're a shippper. Something about her every hair chanting his name.
TBH, I'm surprised and impressed at the self control of Mrs Krishnas in not murdering him after that answer
It is stated time and again that only Kuru or Panchal king could be emperor, then why didn’t they try to do that Yagya which could make them emperor?
Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali
I don't think arjuna was the important person/friend for krishna for a simple reason that whenever it came to picking a side he always choose panchali over arjuna.
well a person can have more than 1 important person in his life.
no body refutes the panchai krishna bond here . Arjun- krishna bond need not be refuted too.
Krishna choose panchalis side because she was right. She was wronged secondly. by her own husbands which included arjuna. But loving dosent see right or wrong. Inspite of all this krishna always said arjuna was most important to him whom he loved the most.. And this not in front of Arjun to impress him he had no profit confessing this in front of daruka. Arjun was the friend he needed in his life as @chilli mentioned.
Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
Krishna marriage to panchali could had not given her anything rather than waiting in d long list of 16000 wives , not getting patrani ,aka chief position which was stricly reserved 4 Rukmini & satyabhama was not great to share her position with anyone , she was already struggling b/w 16000 . After so much drama done by satyabhama she never got main chief queen position of krishna. Rukmini always enjoyed prime queen position
Regarding draupadi jaha krishna itni shaadi charity ke liye ki thi ek aur sahi kya faraq parta Rukmini ko.
Nothing suggest krishna was interested in draupadi he don't need to coz he was not latoo on her beauty , he already had many with him . Nor draupadi can stop him in marrying anyone else.
During draupadi"s swayamber he was already married thrice .
Pity on people who don't understand d purity of krishna draupadi's relationship which of a friend not more than that nor less than that, it was pure friends hip
i agree with this.. there need not be romantic attraction in everything. and it is not that, only romantic involvement makes the relation deep. Platonic bonds can be equally deep like krishna draupadi was.
Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
Thnks a lot , I know he valued a lot arjun , I will share what today u told about krishna arjun , same thing some other person also told me few years before , thou I dint believe it that time coz I was behind nar narayan theory.
I think he used to miss balram of gokul , which made him more close to arjun .
Even balram was jealous of arjun , he even accused krishna about it .
Even satyabhama 2 was jealous of arjun .
U won't believe my frnd told me Krishna did something special 4 arjun to make get rid of his pain 4 Abhimanyu. That was some tender scene 🤣
well he lit some candles decorated the room with flowers etc i think to make arjun feel better. IDK how that would feel for a father who just lost his son though.😔
Then they spent another couple nights together in indraprastha after the war when krishna gave him another geeta gyan.
then one more night spent together before krishna departed for dwarka at hastinapur
@hearmeroar had shared citation links to the last 2 instances
And I am not hinting at romance between the two. i see only platonic bond between them like i see for kishna panchali. Its the way i see relationships and people. others may see it differently
well he lit some candles decorated the room with flowers etc i thin to make arjun feel better. IDK how that would feel for a father who just lost his son though.😔
Then they spent another couple nights together in indraprastha after the war when krishna gave him another geeta gyan.
then one more night spent together before krishna departed for dwarka at hastinapur
@hearmeroar had shared citation links to the last 2 instances
And I am not hinting at romance between the two. i see only platonic bond between them like i see for kishna panchali. Its the way i see relationships and people. others may see it differently
Thnks I have d citations
I guess when he was leaving d mortal world he sent daruk 2 call only arjun from Hastinapur .
There is one more where he say he will give away his wives & children if arjun ask 4 something when ashwatthama ask 4 sudarshan chakra ( I can be wrong )
I agree not doubt draupadi was important to krishna , he definitely had great affection 4 d lady , he participated in war 4 her & kept his promise.
What I can say if krishna himself said he keep arjun above everyone
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Others were killed by Kritvarma and even by Kripacharya. Aside Dhristhdhyum, Shikhandi did need to be taken away
My point is that since they all knew what would happen, wouldn't it be advisable to at least warn them to be cautious?
Prativindhya was actually killed while he was sleeping, others resisted but were just out of bed
I myself doubt Krishna's intentions in the massacre on night 18, but such a stupid resistance mechanism after having known the evil intentions is just sheer stupidity. Something they didn't exhibit any other time.
Anyhow my points still hold valid. Krishna wanted strong Pandavas and needed their support, but was definitely not looking for Yudhishtir becoming the Samrat, he wanted Yudhishtir/Pandavas as a strong ally not as an overlord
Did the pandavas & panchali too know that ashwatthama had plans to kill. why would they run away instead of staying there and protecting themselves and leaving their kids at risk. Why would krishna leave them like that given his affection to arjun & panchali. that too after seeing the death of of their other sons they would be extra careful and cautious. Some things in MB dont make sense
well he lit some candles decorated the room with flowers etc i thin to make arjun feel better. IDK how that would feel for a father who just lost his son though.😔
Then they spent another couple nights together in indraprastha after the war when krishna gave him another geeta gyan.
then one more night spent together before krishna departed for dwarka at hastinapur
@hearmeroar had shared citation links to the last 2 instances
And I am not hinting at romance between the two. i see only platonic bond between them like i see for kishna panchali. Its the way i see relationships and people. others may see it differently
It wasn’t to make Arjuna feel better, I think it was their routine for the night
Sanjaya said, “The lord Pundarikaksha entered Arjuna’s unmatched abode. He touched water and spread out an excellent bed on the plain and auspicious floor. It was made out of darbha grass, with the complexion of lapis lazuli. He duly adorned it with garlands, parched grain, fragrances and auspicious objects and surrounded the bed with supreme weapons. Partha also touched water. Humble servants produced
sacrifices27 offered every night to Tryambaka.28 Partha delightedly adorned Madhava with fragrances and garlands and tendered the nightly
offerings.29 Govinda smiled and spoke to Phalguna. ‘O Partha! O fortunate one! Lie down. For the sake of your welfare, I will leave.’ He placed gatekeepers there and other well-armed men for the sake of
protection.
It is stated time and again that only Kuru or Panchal king could be emperor, then why didn’t they try to do that Yagya which could make them emperor?
Excluding Bharat I don't think any Kuru has been a Chakravarti Samrat (actually I doubt even he was one) and definitely no Panchal has ever been one. The ones who did Vajpaye weren't Kuru or Panchal
Do you really think Suryavanshis couldn't become emperors? They were bluer blood, Ram ji did an Ashwamedh and majority accepted his predominance. Just because Yayati said something doesn't mean that all across the country would follow that centuries later too.. He wasn't some owner of the country.
They didn't do the Yagya because they weren't capable enough, they couldn't defeat everyone
comment:
p_commentcount