~| Whatever you want to argue about |~ - Page 12

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Exactly, He said he won't kill these two, there were many great warriors who could have done the job. He didn't go against his army, he tried to persuade them into not killing them but he never sabotaged their plan, he had one moment of weakness where he saw his father figure dying and had an outburst that too because Yudi kept asking him about noises (This guy 🙄), He didn't say a single word after his outburst, he was crying for Bhishma and Drona's death, they were humans, had human emotions, but after Drona's death he recovered quickly and protected his army, I have provided citation for his fight after Drona's death. It was a moment of lapse, the anger wasn't against Draupadi, he was hurt seeing someone he loved die

Contrary to majority opinion i actually find this a beautiful characteristic.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

I have read the full part here and it is clear that Krishna is saying he is in FAVOUR of war, does not necessarily mean he is desirous of picking up arms.. Try reading this another time. The whole conversation.

Also, considering you are right,

He is saying this now and then when Dury and Arjun goes to him why does he say he will remain weaponless? Why does he give narayani sena to duryodhan? And after giving he says he won't fight?

I have read

I don't think krishna trusted arjuna much he was hus friend i am sure krishna knew about his atikomal nature.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

.

I never said duty that brings bloodshed is right. Let us not twist words now shall we

I said that when all other options of stopping bloodshed has already been refused and it has cone to war then one should pick their duty over relationship and might with all the might because that would reduce bloodshed

Already said what i had to regarding this in above posts so not elaborating or repeating.

Duty over relationship means to love ur loved ones who u have grown up with, no harm in protecting them. Besides one emotional outburst doesn't prove anything he even killed Bhishma in proper battle. Check the threads made by Nora about this for citations if needed

Ok we are going in circles about this so let us agree to disagree . I have already added them in the list. So...

Arjuna was nice human being though even he had his flaws its not necessary that i will agree with everything he did. There is reason why i prefer krishna and krishnaa over arjuna and all the other characters and no its not because they were bloodthirsty beast because they were not.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

I have read

I don't think krishna trusted arjuna much he was hus friend i am sure krishna knew about his atikomal nature.

Exactly more reason why he should have fought himself if he knows his nature and knows he maybe unwilling if he CARES?

I am not saying Krishna didn't care but trying to show war isn't the pointer for caring.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Ok we are going in circles about this so let us agree to disagree . I have already added them in the list. So...

Arjuna was nice human being though even he had his flaws its not necessary that i will agree with everything he did. There is reason why i prefer krishna and krishnaa over arjuna and all the other characters and no its not because they were bloodthirsty beast because they were not.

That's okay, personal opinion is not something we can debate about. I prefer Arjuna over everyone else i have my own reasons. We are debating about other facts here-

1. Arjun didn't care about Panchali which I am refuting.

2. Arjun didn't do his duty in war - I am refuting.

Personal opinions remain, that cannot be debated.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Exactly more reason why he should have fought himself if he knows his nature and knows he maybe unwilling if he CARES?

I am not saying Krishna didn't care but trying to show war isn't the pointer for caring.

I have already added both arjuna and bhima to the list. So end of the story

But yes i will repeat again krishna drishtdyum cared more for panchali then any of the pandava did.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

That's okay, personal opinion is not something we can debate about. I prefer Arjuna over everyone else i have my own reasons. We are debating about other facts here-

1. Arjun didn't care about Panchali which I am refuting.

2. Arjun didn't do his duty in war - I am refuting.

Personal opinions remain, that cannot be debated.

Arjuna had other properties but since i have already added him and bhima to the list so yeah that s about it

Also to conclude pandavas were lucky to have a woman like panchal. But panchali anyday deserves better.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Contrary to majority opinion i actually find this a beautiful characteristic.

Arjuna bajaoing Yudi is my favorite thing about hin 🤣 I didn't like him before I read that part, then I started reading war parvas etc and loved how was was secure in his manhood and capabilities, and this quality of his where he ranks emotions above the norms of Kshatriya duty is definitely a refreshing change for me.

@Poorabhforever - I would pick Draupadi over Krishna and Krishna over Arjuna too 🙈