Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 3 - Page 13

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

29.5k

Users

20

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I agree would say she preferred NS the least because while asking for boons from Dhritrashtra she simply added at last that she also needs the twins freed. At least she could have respectfully named themπŸ˜†

Vyasa always culminates them together as twins πŸ˜†. I think it was more vyasa s wording than drapaud s feelings But if we go by that logic she preferred yudhishtra the most since she takes him back first an entire boon only for dharmraj. And we all know how true that is. But since sahadev supported war over peace for wifey i would say they had a bond can't say about nakula though

Edited by Poorabhforever - 4 years ago
AninditaB thumbnail
Anniversary 5 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Lazybird_Silpa

in sp she was shown jealous that kunti could have sons through mantra and told kunti something like she can't have kids or something don't remember what she exactly said then kunti felt bad and taught her the mantra and she had nakul sahdev.


Yeah. She said some stories of Monkey and then Kunti felt bad and taught her mantras to bear children.

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

I am getting quite tired of such talks without any proof any citation where she mentions her preference order?? Of nakul and sahadev being least favourite and arjuna being the most. And no lets not get inti i have heard or i believe or some logic. But clearly where she mentions she prefers arjuna the most and nakul sahadev the least


I myself believe Draupadi was not biased to her husband but nakul sehdev not gotten that importance which Yudi, bheem , arjun had got vedvyas also never much importance 2 nakul sehdev . Draupadi never turn towards nakul sehdev for help like she turn 2 bheem arjun .she treated nakul sehdev with great affection. Nakul sehdev most follow Yudi.

NoraSM thumbnail
Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Anniversary 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Well to say that, if there was no feeling of discrimination, why did Yudhishtir stake Nakul n Sahdev before Kunti's sons?

Not only this but Sakuni suggested Arjuna and Bhima's name, Yudhistira staked Nakul and Sahadev without any suggestion from Sakuni


5 Pandavas represent a toxic bond of brotherhood to me, Their real feelings were suppressed, Yudhistira was their brain and Mouthpiece

AninditaB thumbnail
Anniversary 5 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Vyasa always culminates them together as twins πŸ˜†. I think it was more vyasa s wording than drapaud s feelings But if we go by that logic she preferred yudhishtra the most since she takes him back first an entire boon only for dharmraj. And we all know how true that is.


But didn't she free Yudi first so that her son Prativindhya wouldn't be called son of a slave?

Edited by Andy3456 - 4 years ago
FlauntPessimism thumbnail
ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 11 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Haven't watched brc one's because I really disliked Pandu, don't know why. Tbh Madri was beautiful there. In SP, they made Madri a little bit vampish may be because she was a true princess unlike Kunti. Or she was jealous that Kunti got a son before her just because she has a mantra to call a God. I remember watching the episode of Bheem's birth. She told Kunti that without brothers or cousin, a king isn't strong. And she looked hopeful that Pandu will tell Kunti to teach Madri the mantra but Pandu wanted Kunti to bear the sons.

Madri wasn't a true princess either. Madra kingdom too was chieftain driven system similar to the Yadavs.

They make sound like Madri considered herself better

NoraSM thumbnail
Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Anniversary 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Oh yes. I read somewhere that she said that she can't give Yudi-Bhim-Arjun same love what she may give to Nakuul and Sahadeva. But Kunti loved her sons equally. So she died along with Pandu.

I saw it in BRC Mahabharata, Kunti asked Yudhistira to take care of her favorite Sahadev

Silpa20 thumbnail
IPL 2023 Match Winner Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Oh yes. I read somewhere that she said that she can't give Yudi-Bhim-Arjun same love what she may give to Nakuul and Sahadeva. But Kunti loved her sons equally. So she died along with Pandu.

in sp also madri said the same thing before dying.jitna pyaar aap mere putro ko dengi shayad mai apke putro ko utna pyaar nahi de paungi.madri said to kunti
Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456


But didn't she free Yudi first so that her son Prativindhya wouldn't be called son as a slave?

I was trying to sarcastic failed i guess 😭 ofcourse freeing yudhishtra has got to do more with prativindhya s status than yudhishtra dearest πŸ˜†

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456


She might have conspired N and S to be Drau's favourite 😁. Or may be a vamp wala saas to Draupadi 😁. (Sorry for illogical ideas)


Nakul Sahdev were 2 attached & loyal 2 Pandavas.


U know my mother said shalya Madrid's bro wanted 2 make nakul sehdev his heir but nakul sehdev were not ready for it.

Top