{|MALINIRAJ Karna: AHAM Sharma's AT#7|} - Page 10

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Candid.. this is very much clear and simple to understand unless you refuse to..

We are not under any circumstances justifying Karna insult to Draupadi, We our self think that what Karna did what Plane 100% wrong,

But the other side of the insult cannot be justified as well, The fact that people are trying to cover the other side of the coin is not good, Karna's insult (To Draupadi )was very bad and he himself accepted it, but Draupadi's insult was too harsh on Karna.

Cant we just say that both of the insults are just plane wrong and should not have happened under any circumstances, Instead of saying that one was a heinous crime and the other one was justified doesn't really make it fair.

Originally posted by: candidfrisky

Karna getting rejected on the basis of caste in swyamvara in the entire Sabha is an Insult. The word 'sutaputra' is not a slang. Karna didn't have any problem when someone called him a Sutaputra. See, in today's generation the lower caste people are known as "Dom" "Chamaar" in simple language. It is not a cheap word but if someone calls you "Dom" chamaar in front of many people, then it definitely feels insulting just like an abuse.

So, Karna used the word "Unchaste" and not wh**e. Later people began to call and changed this unchaste into wh**e. The original Sanskrit word was "Varaangana" which has been translated into "Unchaste" by KMG. Unchaste means characterless and not prostitute but then its okay, let it be prostitute because Karna has to be denigrated.

So if Unchaste can be changed into a wh**e then, Sutaputra term can be changed into "Dom" "Chamaar" so Karna was called a "Dom" "Chamaar" in the entire assembly which sounds offensive. If I say "Mujhe kisi Dom Chamaar se shaadi nahi karni" even in a polite way then also, it does sound insulting. Now, you can imagine how Karna must have felt at that time when he was called a Sutaputra in the entire Sabha where Kings and principled people were present.

One thing I've never understood - why was Karna's identity disclosure needed for the Pandavas to know that they had wronged him? It makes it look like everything they did to Radheya was okay, and it became a sin only once he was revealed to be Kaunteya?

Wow! Congratulations on the new AT! 👏
In yesterday's episode, more than Karna's dialogue and scene with Dury I liked when Mamashree was telling the how they will trick Bheesha (mujhe pehle se hi patta tha...bla bla bla) Karna stood behind with Duri and Dushi and looked here and there while Mamashree spoke!😆😉 I noticed him and was thinking.. if he is getting bored. 😆

I just saw the episode in which Karna got his curse, and the difference between his looks was quite large, He looked Majestic in that episode, The current wig and that episode's wig has a big difference.

TheWatcher - At that time, Aham was also very thin, very lean and his Kundalas (earrings) were different. It was bigger in size, now his Kundalas (earrings) has been changed by the jewellery designer. I have clearly noticed it.

Also, now he has put on 15kgs weight and now, he looks even more majestic and pretty. 😊

@Vrish I have asked myself the same question plenty of times. It really doesn't make sense!

@debasree04- beautiful siggies... specially loved Radheya one...😊