If we think from gandhari's POV then it was a selfless act but practically it's a really stupid decision. She should have bee her husband's strength. Rather than sharing his pains, she should have vowed to remove them by being his eyes
Originally posted by: sandy_rags
Yes, I agree with all your views...also I felt that dhritarastra having been blind from birth would sense the world from a different dimension...he has adapted himself to his blindness in his own way...but a person like Gandhari who has already seen the world, may perhaps find herself more handicapped than him...
Originally posted by: sandy_rags
as for his ambitions about becoming king may be his grand mother aloud him such dreams but if shaastra says that a blind person who is blind from birth can never be a king why did nobody stop dhritrashtra from dreaming such useless dreams and why Pandu was not prepared to be a king????Exactly...if Vidur knew that a blind person cannot be king, then surely Bheeshm and others must have known...why didn't anyone say this to Dhritarastra?
Exactly! Maybe they were waiting for the right moment to throw the bomb. Its like bruising his ego even further.
Re Gandhari's selfless act, I think she should have waited to gauge what Dhritarashtra's ambitions and thoughts in life are about... she jumped upon her decision without really knowing what her husband wanted from her. Cause here the case was entirely opposite. He feels the complex due to her vow now!
comment:
p_commentcount