Was Dhritarashtra so desperate for throne../ VB Nt pg 7 - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

51

Views

6.2k

Users

20

Likes

115

Frequent Posters

rasyafan thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: visrom

I didn't understand one thing. Yesterday they showed that Vidur was made mantri before Dhitarashtra was made king because Bhishma thought that Dhritarashtra(so tough to type thru mobile ) may not make Vidur mantri. But once Dhritarashtra becomes king, he can dismiss Vidur any time can't he? So what was the big deal?



But Dhritrashtra can dismiss only after and if he becomes a king if he is not then no question of removing Vidhur may be Bheeshm knew what Vidhur is gonna say or do that is why he cunningly suggested what he did to Raj mata πŸ˜‰ I had this feelign yesterday

But even if by chance Dhritrashtra can becomes a king then on what basis he would remove a chief minister mukhya mantri after all it is a big post

and when he was a king why did he not make Duryodhan yuvraj and why he agreed only if half heartedly for Yudhisthar to be Yuvraj

My guess is there are rules and regulations policies for every act even for the King himself as pointed out by Vidhur πŸ˜•πŸ˜•πŸ˜•




navya19 thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: Nandiniraizaada

No he had regards for his wife

They are overdoing it

I completely agree with U😊
rasyafan thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: lovesunshine

I was the most excited for MB..now i'm very disappointing. one thing because they said they had trained the actors for more than a year to get accustomed to the respective characters they are playing but apart from a few seasoned actors all the others are horrible in dialogues delivery, body language and getting into the skin of the character.

I love SRJ as vishnu in DKDM.. he was also good in some parts as krishna but some episodes where he has to take a walk or they show his entire posture he needs to work on it..as in yesterday's episode never liked the way he was walking or standing, not at all at par to shri krishna's character..I am not blaming sRJ here but it should be the episode director who should ask to do the retake of the scene until its perfect.

then there other long list of actors...that ambika , amablika are oof too horribly plain in dialogues delivery.. even that ganga looks like a ramp model ...when she says 'putra' to bheeshma i feel irritated 😑 no good acting at all

then the script and screenplay are not up to the mark even they are stretching certain things like the suhaag raat of dhritarshtra and him rejecting gandhaari that night...dont know whether this is in the original MB by ved vyaas and whats the point to stretch this factor? we all know they are going to get it done and are going to have a hundred sons..instead why did they not show the ganga shaantanu story?

The costumes and make up were supposed to be done after long discussions and engaging veteran bhanu athaiya ..but they hardly look like modern day's costumes with a splash of antique jewellery...oof some of those noodle straps and off shoulder clothes dont suit at all...

I think we should now accept the fact that this is the MB of daily soap makers..with all the saas bahu and saazish dramas in it..



My feelings exactly 😭

the actors are straight out of acting school πŸ˜† Everyone from Bheeshm to raj mata to AA to vidhur are over acting they are very very contious of what. They are doing just too much. There is no simplicity, naturalness in their act, no innocence. They are just too aware of themselves.

they are acting as if they are gods gift to humanity all of them.

this mahabharat is written by Star Plus and NOT MAHARISHI VED VYAS

Same goes for SRJ he is not being directed properly that is why he lacks that aweness of Shri Vishnuji in DKDM there is not acting much for him to do, only conveying messages through his beautiful face and even more beautiful mystical oh so expressive eyes πŸ‘πŸ˜†

the director of this serial is NOT DOING HIS JOB PROPERLY HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO DIRECT

I hated acting of Ratan Rajpoot Good Grief not a single shred of that femininity in her which I expect from a Arya putri of that time

actually the makers of Mahabharat lack understanding of actual Mahabharat they are making it on the basis of pretensions preconceived notions rather then facts that actually happened they are thinking too much and researching not at all

their whole focus is in making actors look good six pack abs hour glass figure skin show glamour jewellery aah beautiful sets and ofcourse the latest technology πŸ‘πŸ˜† so why focus on acting when viewers would be too busy to watch such stuff especially ladies but they missed a point that viewers are very inteligent these days and they want good beautiful performances in the shows they watch and they want paisa wasool for thier important time.

too bad for themπŸ˜ƒ

Aah did you notice the beautiful Ganga maiya who appeared in the pose of a model rather then Gangaji the goddess well and her sexy smile just for her "putra" horible acting and not at all goddess material

b grade fashion ramp ki model lag rahi thi 😑🀒

they are making it not for the sake of spirituality or to tell people about our sacred epic and text but only to sell us their glamour fashion jewellery technology

this mahabharat failed on all meanignfull account which matter performances good direction good technology good lessons good entertainment and most importantly to give shraddhanjali to a great creation of our Rishi Munis like B r Chopra did he made yet another history he brought all the charatcers of Mahabharat and that era right in front of our eyes.

No don't think I am comparing I am not always knew nothing can match that awesome piece of art and hard work of lot of people but i definitely expected genuine good work respect spirituality good feeling that awe inspiring feeling in this serial 😊

But seriously this one is a huge dissapointment 😭 hmmm unfortuantely

922872 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: visrom

They are over doing a lot of things...like Dhritarashtra walking out in anger, Gandhari wearing flowers all over her body...I don't think it's necessary to show all these intricate details, unless they are planning a 10000 episode serial. Mahabharat is a big story with lots of branches and sub branches. Will they visit each and everything in so much detail?
Sorry...but Krishna popping in all of a sudden in the middle is also a distraction. It's after all a half an hour episode...on top of it we have ad breaks...uske oopar Krishna bhi gyaan dene aa gaye toh kahani kaise aage badhegi? πŸ˜•
Krishna was probably brought in to fill in Samay's shoes. But his dialogues lack the punch that Samay had. They are too confusing at times.



I think its highly commendable of them that they have managed to show such intricate things in a time when most of the people miss such small detailing. This shows how much research they have done for each and every episode. And yes,because Mahabharat has so many branches that is why this show is a 'daily soap' and not a 3 hr movie. Simple!
922872 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: rasyafan



My feelings exactly 😭

the actors are straight out of acting school πŸ˜† Everyone from Bheeshm to raj mata to AA to vidhur are over acting they are very very contious of what. They are doing just too much. There is no simplicity, naturalness in their act, no innocence. They are just too aware of themselves.

they are acting as if they are gods gift to humanity all of them.

this mahabharat is written by Star Plus and NOT MAHARISHI VED VYAS

Same goes for SRJ he is not being directed properly that is why he lacks that aweness of Shri Vishnuji in DKDM there is not acting much for him to do, only conveying messages through his beautiful face and even more beautiful mystical oh so expressive eyes πŸ‘πŸ˜†

the director of this serial is NOT DOING HIS JOB PROPERLY HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO DIRECT

I hated acting of Ratan Rajpoot Good Grief not a single shred of that femininity in her which I expect from a Arya putri of that time

actually the makers of Mahabharat lack understanding of actual Mahabharat they are making it on the basis of pretensions preconceived notions rather then facts that actually happened they are thinking too much and researching not at all

their whole focus is in making actors look good six pack abs hour glass figure skin show glamour jewellery aah beautiful sets and ofcourse the latest technology πŸ‘πŸ˜† so why focus on acting when viewers would be too busy to watch such stuff especially ladies but they missed a point that viewers are very inteligent these days and they want good beautiful performances in the shows they watch and they want paisa wasool for thier important time.

too bad for themπŸ˜ƒ

Aah did you notice the beautiful Ganga maiya who appeared in the pose of a model rather then Gangaji the goddess well and her sexy smile just for her "putra" horible acting and not at all goddess material

b grade fashion ramp ki model lag rahi thi 😑🀒

they are making it not for the sake of spirituality or to tell people about our sacred epic and text but only to sell us their glamour fashion jewellery technology

this mahabharat failed on all meanignfull account which matter performances good direction good technology good lessons good entertainment and most importantly to give shraddhanjali to a great creation of our Rishi Munis like B r Chopra did he made yet another history he brought all the charatcers of Mahabharat and that era right in front of our eyes.

No don't think I am comparing I am not always knew nothing can match that awesome piece of art and hard work of lot of people but i definitely expected genuine good work respect spirituality good feeling that awe inspiring feeling in this serial 😊

But seriously this one is a huge dissapointment 😭 hmmm unfortuantely




So stop watching the show.πŸ˜† What's the use of watching every episode and then saying its not as good as BR Chopra's Mahabharat? Crticism is fine but when someone doesn't like a show, they stop watching it. So I would recommend you to stop watching the new Mahabharat and instead watch reruns of old Mahabharat in Star Utsav /Youtube.😊
rasyafan thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: AbbaDabbaJabba.



So stop watching the show.πŸ˜† What's the use of watching every episode and then saying its not as good as BR Chopra's Mahabharat? Crticism is fine but when someone doesn't like a show, they stop watching it. So I would recommend you to stop watching the new Mahabharat and instead watch reruns of old Mahabharat in Star Utsav /Youtube.😊



Thanks for your recommendation πŸ˜†πŸ˜‰ but actually I don't need it. still thanks πŸ˜ƒ

Actually I did stop watching it after a few episodes but reading people's comments in this forum raised my curiosity and then I watched again some episodes and till now I am in a state of shock πŸ˜† that they have degraded our heores of Mahabharat in such a manner that I cannot help but comment here. For example such a dignified Dhritrashtra of Original Mahabhart reduced to be a spoilt brat and last night in the serial he entered in such huff and puff as if Bheeshm and the royal darbar was handing him his favorite toy to manoa him 🀣 his whole physical attitude was so laughable and annoying not to mention irritating

And what can I say about bechari Gandhari.

I thought I would inform people that this is not how original mahabharat tells it's story but thanks god many people are better informed.

I am not against this Mahhabharat either but actually they should mention that this is not based on original and it is rather imaginary, people who have not heard or read original mahabharat or who have not scene B R chopra's mahabharat would get the wrong idea this is my main chinta 😊

I think I have a full right to feel that anyone from any religion would feel the same if either Bible or Kuran is depicted in a twisted manner and we all know what mayhem gets created πŸ˜† πŸ˜† Atleast that is not how I show my irritation.

Actually I am loving watching this show it is more comedy rather then a story based on a beautiful epic called The Mahabharat. πŸ˜†
rasyafan thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: AbbaDabbaJabba.



I think its highly commendable of them that they have managed to show such intricate things in a time when most of the people miss such small detailing. This shows how much research they have done for each and every episode. And yes,because Mahabharat has so many branches that is why this show is a 'daily soap' and not a 3 hr movie. Simple!



Yes it is just that a daily soap (not an epic) full of commercial masala and comedy πŸ˜† glamour skin show and beautiful sets and zero performance 🀒

I think they should also mention before each episode that this version of Mahabharat is not based on Maharishi Ved Vyas's original but it is rather production of their own minds and their own efforts. 🀣
Gold.Abrol thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#38
In my opinion yes as all said he suffered from complex when pandu was crowned as a king n correctly said it was the root cause of mahabharat. he thought what is being done is unfair n moreover he wanted that his sons should not suffer the same it was his aspirations that tranwered into his son duryudhan ya but i think they r overdoing it 😊
Sabhayata thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#39
Rasyafan
We get it you dont like the show you have made it very obvious by harping on the same points again and again
ANd dont worry 90% of people here would have either seen or read Mahabharat so let them decide whether this show is imaginary or not you cant decide for them You think this show is a comedy or not based on the epic fine that is your opinion but other'smay not think so.I have read many versions of mahabharat and have seen all versions of Mahabharat on TV .Yes BR chopra will always be the best but this is good as well.I Have read mahabahart i dont think this MB is imaginary at all that is my opinion .Just becuase you think this mahabahart is imaginary and not real doenst make it the truth.Its just your oipnion.So makers dont have to say anything becuas eof one person's opinion
Justitia thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#40
And, here I was under the impression that comparisons with BRC MB in any form was strictly frowned upon in this forum (some users on this forum apparently seem to get extremely worked up whenever the old MB is mentioned, for whatever reason).
Anyway, here is my take -
Dhritarashtra always held his blindness responsible for his persistent inaction. Since old MB has been mentioned by other users, I'll also make a reference to the old MB -
Dhritarashtra's two favourite dialogues in old MB were "Mein kya karoon?" (what can I do?) and "Yeh netraheen Dhritarashtra aur kar bhi kya sakta hai?" (what more can this blind Dhritarashtra even do?)
And both these dialogues were uttered with utmost helplessness.

Dhritarashtra also suffered from putramoh (unhealthy attachment) towards Duryodhan. Dhritarashtra was always regarded as Pandu's substitute on the throne - something that he never really accepted. And since Dhritarashtra was denied the throne, he wanted Duryodhan to achieve what he himself couldn't - becoming the king of Hastinapur per se (not just a substitute). And therefore, he NEVER uttered a word against his own son, no matter what the circumstances.

Bharat (NOT Ram's brother, but the king after whom our country "Bhaarat" is named) had started the principle of appointing the "most worthy" person as his successor (even if that "worthy" person was a commoner, and not his own son). Bharat was the king, but he believed in democracy. By the time, Shantanu became king, all these democratic principles were completely forgotten, and the eldest son was automatically assumed to be the "defacto" yuvraj and future king - "worthiness" or not. Also, Satyavati's FATHER's condition of her own sons becoming the future rulers of Hastinapur (& Devavrat's brahmachari oath) worsened this situation even further.

A time came when the eldest son (the "defacto" yuvraj, if you like) was born blind. And his younger brother became the king. Granted, the younger brother himself did not enjoy good health. Then again, anything is better for a king than literally being blind. And, judging from Dhritarashtra's lackadaisical attitude and passivity throughout the story, he wasn't just born blind, he lacked vision in a "figurative sense" as well...

What Dhritarashtra (and his sons) NEVER realized was that becoming the king (or the yuvraj) is a huge responsibility as well - and not just a right. The Pandavas learnt this the hard way during their vanvaas and agyatvaas. Whereas the Kauravas lacked foresight completely, nicely enjoying themselves in Hastinapura during the vanvaas and agyaatvaas of the Pandavas. And, they must've never imagined in their wildest dreams how hard the Pandavas would come at them post-vanvaas and agyaatvaas, resulting in the Kurukshetra war.
Top