I've not looked hard enough to find this happening in the forum or in comments under articles so nothing to add about that, but I do think the comparisons by the show's crew in the articles themselves are somewhat distasteful. I may very well agree that the costumes,sets, and special effects of this show are better than its predecessor's. However, that's because they spent more money on it, and the only reason they had the confidence to spend more money on it is because they knew there's a guaranteed audience for it. And there would be no guarantee of an audience for it if the older shows hadn't whetted people's appetite for content like this. So yeah, I'd like to see comparisons stop too, and from all sides - viewers, media, and those behind the show. Having seen the first episode, I think that there's PLENTY to appreciate about it on its own merit, without bringing other shows into the conversation for any reason whatsoever.
I pretty much agree with everything people have said. I know comparisons are inevitable to an extent, but I'd rather we compare shows to the actual epic than to each other, especially since both the versions are being made by two different production houses. What bothers me is when people talk as if certain old actors own the roles of God. I get it that the old shows were popular and etched into people's minds, but why can't viewers be mature about it? If these comparisons came after the show began, then it would be a little more understandable, but before even watching any of the episodes, no one has the right to make such widespread and critical judgments.
comment:
p_commentcount