Originally posted by: rinki_99
there are quite a few things to unpack here.
1) theoretically, haseena isn't wrong. if she wants to stop the gang, she has to go to the root cause of the problem. she was looking at correlation and not causation thus far. so yes, it's a fair assessment that solving the root cause will solve the problem.
2) realistically, it's not going to work or a least it shouldn't work. she is going off the assumption that solving the case will rid the victims of their trauma and pain. how is one supposed to trust a system so broken on the inside that heinous crimes such as molestation and slander were swept under the rug? they got victims blamed by a system sworn to protect them. they can't trust that again.
let's take a recent case for example. when the electricity supply was cut from the station, they has to cross so many hurdles just to get their station operational again. in haseena's own words, if government-appointed civil servants had to go through so much trouble, what would a common man have to go through.
now lets take that scenario adn transform it into something more sinister.
yes, they can be hopeful for change because there are still the likes of haseena who aren't corrupted. but is that enough? sad to say, this is pretty much in character for haseena because every single time she has tried this approach, it worked. all her cases, even her own staff members seem to operate that way.
3) the question of morality still stands. haseena is self-righteous so of course, this approach to her is wrong. but the gang isn't holier than thou so consequences are damned they are going to do things their way or the highway. which is actually what I like about them. they aren't presented as paragons of morality. that's where the conflict the article speaks of comes about. so unless haseena manages to change their core principles and ethics, she ain't going to be able to put a stop to this. i seriously hope she fails cause man will I be pissed to see another moral lesson with them. just let them be bro.
comment:
p_commentcount