Originally posted by: eklayvafan1
Like the scene when Krishna had died, I absolutely loved the scene between Kamal/Pallavi, how the first time they weren't accusing each other or blaming each other for Krishna's death. But instead they shared this beautiful comforting each other and understanding each other pains space that we hadn't scene from them for so long. Sometimes I feel if Paro or Kamal show some trust or confidence in her, that would do wonders for there relationships. And who knows maybe Pallavi would team up with them to revenge Krishna's death from Rajo/Trishna. Now that would be one splendid track, if it ever happened. It would be nice if Kamal and Paro actually shared and admitted to each other that there is certain goodness in Pallavi since day one, and that has been in the form of Krishna. That's why I think when Pallavi says to Paro in yesterdays ep, 'who knows better than you babhi, that the thing you love the most, you don't want to lose it'. Indirectly she tried to tell Paro about Om, that how she suffered the loss of Om when he died. Instead of Paro going home and questioning Pallavi's return of Chotu so quick, I would have loved it had she sat down and thought about what Pallavi said, understood she has suffered for the past 18 years aswell, and maybe given her some benefit of the doubt.
Also on the approaches of life that you have mentioned, again that's interesting how one analyses this. Paro has always been the one who has 'sacrificed' in her life whilst Pallavi doesn't belief in living like that. She has always been the self-centred, and did whatever would be beneficial for her and her future, like anyone of us would do??? People like Paro don't exist in today's world; even in that sense I feel that Pallavi's character is more identifiable and realistic than Paro's on occasions. As whatever she did was what was in her best interest, emotions that we live and feel in our life's everyday.
All in all I would say that I personally relate to what Pallavi says and does and what she has suffered is as saddening as when Paro suffers from the hands of AG's. I wouldn't say that Pallavi is a perfect picture obviously she isn't, but sometimes if you uncover deep down these characters, people like Pallavi exist today and you recognize where she is coming from.
P.S. Sorry to have gone on forever, but characters like Pallavi are so complex and interesting that you love analysing them from all angles.
Absolutely - that scene that you described really was a complete step up in Kamal and Pallavi's relationship - both of them displaying a kind of hitherto-unseen maturity. It was that scene that gave me hope that *maybe* they would be able to move on past the hatred and the bitterness. Even if they could never be friends, they would at least be able to understand each other. Another scene that comes to mind is when Pallavi came to the house when they were mourning Krishna, and at first Kamal wanted her out of there. But she stayed and kept getting angry at them - where is Krishna? What happened to him? Where is he, really? - and eventually Kamal broke down and told her "YOUR son is dead. OUR son is dead". After years of fighting and refusing to let her be his mother, Kamal finally acknowledged that she was Krishna's mother in every respect. That was such a poignant and well-executed scene; I really felt so bad for Pallaviπ.
As for Parvati, I know that to compare her with Pallavi is silly, because she has never done anything to harm her family, like Pallavi has, justification or not. But Paro herself knows how it feels to lose the one person you love the most in the world, and to then be blamed for things that you would never do. She suffered for 18 years because her family believed someone else's rubbish over her own truth. I know that she has no reason to believe Pallavi, but like you said, she should at least have drawn on her own experience and *considered* that perhaps Pallavi has moved on.
Characters like Parvati don't exist in the real world. It is characters like Pallavi, like Shruti, that exemplify human nature. This is why I can relate more strongly to them than to Paro or anyone else. When Paro was Janki, I liked her because, on the face of it at least, she displayed vanity, anger, bitterness and revenge. My favourite moment of hers as Janki was the day after she had been insulted by Trishna at the first party she went to in AG House (the one where she was asked to show the mole on her back). She was at home, with no one around her to lay on an act for, but she was on the phone, telling someone to destroy the AG House, and she was furious because she, Janki Devi, had been insulted and mocked. There was no need for pretence in that scene - no one was watching - but that was no pretence. It was the truth - after 18 years, she had learnt to feel a few of the baser, worldy, emotions. I loved that scene, because it proved to me that Parvati was human after allπ
Don't worry - as you can see, I can also wax lyrical about these charactersπ I could write whole essays on the psychology of Pallavi and Shruti, because, as I say, I can identify with their situations, even if I don't always agree with their actions.
@Ankit - I know, I loved Sambhav! So sad he die, he would definitely have been better than Sameer!
comment:
p_commentcount