Gauri's tantrums - even media agrees

We all had been discussing the right and wrong of Gauri's behavior in the sets of KKPKKY. While most of us felt that she crossed the limits and gave a good show of "poor behavior", a handful claimed that it was all our imagination and only if media writes something like that about her, they will believe !

Wow...😆 the proof worked like a magic. Thank you Telly Buzz, for driving home a point so well.I hope now Gauri gets the message loud and clear to what general public think about her "acts"

Finally a sensible article telling about this particular part of the show. Finally a sensible article is here. 👍🏼👏👏 What an article. What was said for another article - Ki show a band baja diya hai. Well now the whole situation is opposite. 😆 Hope even this is now not called someone's imagination.

Now what does the article say about such stars as Gauri Pradhan!!!

Is it the lack of sporting spirit, or inability to believe that they can be criticized too or is it some attention seeking tactics? Or is it some scripted drama just to raise the TRP? Whatever it may be, it sure raises the question mark on their behavior!!

Scripted drama!!!! Lack of sporting spirit!!! Attention seeking tactics!!!! 😆😆😆 Yeh main nahi ab media keh raha hai. 😆

First of all, you may feel the IF-telly buzz article makes sense, it doesn't mean it's mandatory for other members to believe the same. Similarly when the previous article which said something in favour of Gauri Pradhan, some members who agree with this article disagreed with that one. So it's really not a big deal as made to be, everyone has different opinions, thus it doesn't make it wrong for us to have agreed with the previous one.
Infact I would say the previous article was more fair in the sense that it wrote things from both sides, Hiten-Gauri's dancing too was criticised as well as the fact that Gauri's behaviour was praised.

In my opinion Gauri's behaviour was in no way outrageous, I didn't see anything wrong with it and am not just stating so because I'm a fan of hers. I genuinely believe she was composed throughout the show and yes she disagreed with the format but at the same time said she respects the judges opinion but disagrees with it, so the judges should have respected hers too instead of trying to make her dance. I felt it was the judges who were rude as they snubbed her and that makes it wrong, being a judge doesn't make their behaviour excusable.

And just because members have not replied to the topic, it doesn't mean 'the point is finally being driven home', as claimed here. They may have chosen not to respond to it. Plus this article had been posted in this forum before and in the main section where members gave their opinion, so I'm wondering why this is posted here again.

Originally posted by: sandali_

First of all, you may feel the IF-telly buzz article makes sense, it doesn't mean it's mandatory for other members to believe the same. Similarly when the previous article which said something in favour of Gauri Pradhan, some members who agree with this article disagreed with that one. So it's really not a big deal as made to be, everyone has different opinions, thus it doesn't make it wrong for us to have agreed with the previous one.
Infact I would say the previous article was more fair in the sense that it wrote things from both sides, Hiten-Gauri's dancing too was criticised as well as the fact that Gauri's behaviour was praised.

In my opinion Gauri's behaviour was in no way outrageous, I didn't see anything wrong with it and am not just stating so because I'm a fan of hers. I genuinely believe she was composed throughout the show and yes she disagreed with the format but at the same time said she respects the judges opinion but disagrees with it, so the judges should have respected hers too instead of trying to make her dance. I felt it was the judges who were rude as they snubbed her and that makes it wrong, being a judge doesn't make their behaviour excusable.

And just because members have not replied to the topic, it doesn't mean 'the point is finally being driven home', as claimed here. They may have chosen not to respond to it. Plus this article had been posted in this forum before and in the main section where members gave their opinion, so I'm wondering why this is posted here again.

Originally posted by: sandali_

First of all, you may feel the IF-telly buzz article makes sense, it doesn't mean it's mandatory for other members to believe the same. Similarly when the previous article which said something in favour of Gauri Pradhan, some members who agree with this article disagreed with that one. So it's really not a big deal as made to be, everyone has different opinions, thus it doesn't make it wrong for us to have agreed with the previous one.

Sorry none disagreed with that article of Hiten even then. Two points were stated. That if the article of Gauri is trashed being false then why not of Hiten's one. Second point was who knows if Hiten is being clean in making the statement. He may be trying to hide the actual facts too. TB articles are genuine all know very well.

Originally posted by: sandali_

Infact I would say the previous article was more fair in the sense that it wrote things from both sides, Hiten-Gauri's dancing too was criticised as well as the fact that Gauri's behaviour was praised.

No TB article on such a matter was ever posted. You are mixing out with another article that was from I think Screen. This article is not for one show. Its an article telling about "Stars" (For me so called) creating starry tantrums. And Gauri incident being one of them.

Originally posted by: sandali_

In my opinion Gauri's behaviour was in no way outrageous, I didn't see anything wrong with it and am not just stating so because I'm a fan of hers. I genuinely believe she was composed throughout the show and yes she disagreed with the format but at the same time said she respects the judges opinion but disagrees with it, so the judges should have respected hers too instead of trying to make her dance. I felt it was the judges who were rude as they snubbed her and that makes it wrong, being a judge doesn't make their behaviour excusable.

Composed!!!!!!!! 😲 From which angle is she looking composed!!!!!!!! 😲

http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=FnjgiWQqq7Q

This is a part of the same show then.

Originally posted by: sandali_

And just because members have not replied to the topic, it doesn't mean 'the point is finally being driven home', as claimed here. They may have chosen not to respond to it. Plus this article had been posted in this forum before and in the main section where members gave their opinion, so I'm wondering why this is posted here again.

Posting in the TB section does not mean discussion cannot be carried out otherwise. Just for 24hrs the discussion is kept on hold so that posts are made in the article. But after that it can always be carried out. Every other section does it. Just because here it's a matter of GHT does not mean some new rule now be created. That topic I forgot to open so the member made a new one. If there's so much problem this can always be merged with that closed one and opened again.

Originally posted by: Bhaskar.T

Sorry none disagreed with that article of Hiten even then. Two points were stated. That if the article of Gauri is trashed being false then why not of Hiten's one. Second point was who knows if Hiten is being clean in making the statement. He may be trying to hide the actual facts too. TB articles are genuine all know very well.

I wasn't referring to Hiten's IF-telly buzz interview when I said previous, I meant the one which came prior to this one, which would be the screen india one. And as for Hiten's interview, well I believe in what he said, it seemed very genuine to me, that's entirely up to everyone else if they don't want to believe it. When the screen india article came out, it was deemed as unprofessional and fake by some members just because something was written against the judges. It was said there too that the screen india article is a figment of people's imagination.
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1007173&TPN=2



No TB article on such a matter was ever posted. You are mixing out with another article that was from I think Screen. This article is not for one show. Its an article telling about "Stars" (For me so called) creating starry tantrums. And Gauri incident being one of them.

Again, I'm not getting confused, the screen india one is the one I was referring to when I said previous. And while some members agree with what was said in the IF-telly buzz, I found the screen india article to be based on both sides and balanced.



Composed!!!!!!!! 😲 From which angle is she looking composed!!!!!!!! 😲

http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=FnjgiWQqq7Q

This is a part of the same show then.

I have already seen the promo when it was posted here in this forum thanks. And I still don't see anything wrong with her behaviour. All she said was that no one can convince her to do something she doesn't believe in and said she doesn't agree and voiced it. And to me she remained composed while receiving some unconstructive criticism and during their exit when the judges snubbed her. Again this is my point of view and how I perceived it whilst watching, I'm not expecting for there to be a consensus here, I'm simply giving my opinion here.



Posting in the TB section does not mean discussion cannot be carried out otherwise. Just for 24hrs the discussion is kept on hold so that posts are made in the article. But after that it can always be carried out. Every other section does it. Just because here it's a matter of GHT does not mean some new rule now be created. That topic I forgot to open so the member made a new one. If there's so much problem this can always be merged with that closed one and opened again.

I never said there is a problem with posting it, I was just wondering. It's not even about me expecting for there to be different rules where GHT are concerned😕.
The thing I have a problem with is how things are being said indirectly, when people that agree with Gauri also concur with articles where things are said in her favour they get accused like done so here and in this thread. But sorry to say the same is done when people who don't agree with Gauri favour articles were things are said against her.
Lastly this IF-telly buzz article and the screen india article are both views given by the writer.

Originally posted by: Bhaskar.T

When article suits our whims, suits our thinking it becomes sensible otherwise it becomes "Imagination". 😆

Its just the personal view of a critic writer. So if this is true then do wait for another such critic article coming out soon somewhere else. Hope we get to hear the same comments even there. 😉

Do refrain from making long quotes. Quote just the part you want to reply to.

Originally posted by: sandali_

I never said there is a problem with posting it, I was just wondering. It's not even about me expecting for there to be different rules where GHT are concerned😕.
The thing I have a problem with is how things are being said indirectly, when people that agree with Gauri also concur with articles where things are said in her favour they get accused like done so here and in this thread. But sorry to say the same is done when people who don't agree with Gauri favour articles were things are said against her.
Lastly this IF-telly buzz article and the screen india article are both views given by the writer.

Did I say that "Imagination" part. 😆 Just picking up a post and using that makes no sense. Do see in what context that was made. Because gHT_Fan was trashing all articles as "Imagination" but called that particular article as "Sensible", first line of this post was made. As for me I consider all articles written by authors as sensible. I never trash a writer even if I don't know the person. End of the day its their hard work.😊 As to the second part well I said that because that article is an individual view same is here so now even this should be called sensible as the other one. Am I right!!! 😃

Yes when it comes to interviews we never know if truth is being told by the interviewer. 😉

Originally posted by: Bhaskar.T

Do refrain from making long quotes. Quote just the part you want to reply to.

Ok, but I only quoted all the parts where I needed to give my points in Blue again after your points in Red.
Did I say that "Imagination" part. 😆 Just picking up a post and using that makes no sense. Do see in what contest that was made. Because gHT_Fan was trashing all articles as "Imagination" but called that particular article as "Sensible", this post was made. As for me I consider all articles written by authors as sensible. Thats why I said that because that article is an individual view same is here so now even this should be called sensible. Am I right!!! 😃

Yes when it comes to interviews we never know if truth is being told by the interviewer. 😉

Admittedly I quoted the wrong thing. But what I'm trying to say is that if some had dismissed articles where things weren't said in favour of GHT, then the same was done when the judges were criticised in the screen india article on this page, where the screen india article was considered unproffessional and also 'a figment of someone's imagination' :
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1007173&TPN=2

So the accusatory tone of this thread isn't really justified, since some from both sides had dismissed an article. And it's not wrong to agree with an article that is accordance to your views.

Aah so if a article points out the cute cute aspects or speaks in favor of Gauri Hiten is a fair article, which doesn't do so is not a fair article.... hahahahaha....how very convenient...