Hania v/s Sakshi
Now here, this is the most hardest comparison. Actually mind-numbingly tiring. I took much more time for this is because I couldn't think of writing anything valuable for both the characters. I always got bored with both Hania and Sakshi. I know, I am heartless... But It was the truth. I just couldn't stand both the characters. They were both boring and did not add much to the story from my POV.
Hania: She is played by Hira Mani. If I could bet, I would bet that I was the only person in the universe who did not like Hania much. Ok Let's start this.
It is not that I hate her.. I just did not like her. There is a difference. She was caring. She was compassionate. She was kind. But.... Yeah... She was not a match for Mehwish.
Hania was introduced as a anti-thesis for Mehwish. A woman who puts love above the material possessions. But then, the execution was weak. Mehwish, as I said, was woman with class. A beauty with brains. But I couldn't say the same for Hania.
She was just there to show audience that what Mehwish did was wrong.. to show how Danish got hurt.. etc...
She was a believable teacher.. that I must give her. She was caring but not nosy. She reminded me my many teachers during my school times, who would understand if I was feeling down by just looking at me. They would ask me but if I didn't want to say much.. they will never force me. But this was enough for me to open up to them on my own.. later..
She was a gift for Roomi. Roomi, who was ignored by a selfish Mehwish and a stupid Danish, was cared for and nurtured by Hania.
But my love towards that character ends there, she was good as Roomi's teacher. I think they should not have added the love angle.
Hania was not exactly a well defined character for a love story. Especially when all the other characters so well defined, she fell flat. She did not have enough time to establish herself.
Maybe it was just me... but I also felt that the age gap was huge between Hania and Danish. Maybe it was not but it felt that some mid-20s girl falling for a mid-30s guy. It is not wrong. There are many people who fall in love with each other with much greater age gaps. But as we all know, it the presentation that makes or breaks. I feel the the writing breaks here.
After few interactions with Danish, Hania looks like a love sick puppy for me. She fell in love with Danish's.... Actually I really don't know what she liked about Danish. But obviously she saw something in him that I did not. It's ok But she just fell in love.. just like that.. which is irritating for me. It looked childish when till now the story dealt with way too many adult themes. It felt out of place.
I also did not like the fact that after her love towards Danish is established, she just ends up talking to her friend/cousin only about Danish's pain and suffering. And it is more irritating when you realize that she did not have much scenes to establish herself before the love arc. We never got much chance to know her. That is why when they introduced the love track for her, I was not drawn to it because, I just know she is a nice teacher but would she be a nice partner for Danish? I never know.
Even her love towards Danish felt empty to me because she only saw Danish's side of the story and started sympathizing with him. She did not see the extreme possessiveness or the extremely toxic patriarchal mindset. Her seeing Danish with the 'rose-tinted' glasses gave me the feeling of her not being much mature. In fact, her 'deep' conversations with her friend/cousin was just written so poorly. In those scenes it felt that she was just a mouthpiece of the writers and nothing else.
Maybe it was because the writers did not know how to write strong minded, mature, kind hearted and independent woman. Or maybe Hania did not get much time to establish herself.
Overall... I was not really surprised when Danish rejected Hania.. He really didn't know much about her other than that she was a kind teacher.
Sakshi: She is played by Ramnitu Chaudhary. Just as I said, I did not like Hania so I was not looking forward to Sakshi character much.. Oh I don't want another character to tell me again that what Akanksha did to Manav was wrong. But to my surprise, she was not that bad......... at the beginning.
I actually liked the way Sakshi's character was introduced. As a student counselor who recognized that one of her student's life was negatively affected by his parents fight. Her meeting both the parents and asking them to co-operate for the mental well being of the student was also believable. It was like the writers of this show also felt that Hania was not defined so they decided to correct that. But then they destroyed whatever hope I had for that character.
She was a person who had life outside the Manav-Yathu-Akanksha circle. She had a life, her interests etc. She also had a tragic backstory and I was glad that she was not going and yapping about her sap story to anyone who was ready to hear. She was reserved. She was sensible. She was mature.
She could be seen as a perfect companion for Manav. She could also have been a better parental figure for Yathu.
Please note that I used the word 'could'.
Because the writers then crushed all the possibilities into dust by making her irritating, dumb and somewhat toxic character.
The moment she started actively calling Yathu as 'Parth' It was game over for me.
Sakshi lost both her husband and son in a car accident. She mourns the death of her son, 'Parth'. (Though she also lost her husband, but I don't think I actually saw her shed even a single tear for her husband ... i don't know why) It is understandable that some things of Yathu reminds her of her dead son. It is still Ok for her to get sometimes confused with Yathu and Parth. After all she is a human being. Human beings are allowed to make some mistakes. But what is not acceptable for me is that she then replaces her dead son by someone else's son. Her act of openly addressing Yathu as 'Parth' is insulting to both Yathu and Parth.
Maybe I would have been less offended if Sakshi was not a child psychiatrist, but she is!!! And she should know better than anyone that her actions are toxic in nature. Now, Yathu doesn't know that Parth is her dead son's name but when he learns of that, what does she think will happen. Poor kid will question the love he is getting. He might start to think that he is just a replacement for his favorite Sakshi Ma'am. He might even think that 'Yathu' may not be deserving to be loved as Sakshi only loves 'Parth'. Poor kid is already growing up to have some trust issues because of his mother, Akanksha's actions. And now, because of Sakshi's actions he may never be able to love himself to the point of self acceptance. Maybe he will grow up to have no amount of self worth.
I have always voiced out my opinions against Sakshi's insistence on calling him 'Parth' multiple times in this forum. It was the most unhealthy aspect of their relationship.
She failed as a psychiatrist for me there but the writers were not satisfied, they had to pulverize any bit of hope in me. She even fails as a child counselor when she gives into every single unrealistic demand of Yathu. Children can make unreasonable demands.. that is not their fault. They don't know much. But if a person, who studied child psychology, does give in to their all unreasonable demands then the adult is at fault. Sakshi, as a child psychiatrist/ school counselor should know by now how to deal with unreasonable demands of children. She should have been able to communicate better with Yathu. But nope. We need TRP so all logic is thrown outside.
Sakshi and Manav's relationship could have been one of the mature relationships of ITV history, if only they executed it with care and patience. But like all the ITV dramas, they had to rush it and complicate it by adding as many plot points as they could.
I think I liked The chemistry between Manav and Sakshi more than Hania and Danish. Maybe the actors did a better job. Or maybe the writers added some more normal scenes than their Pakistani counterpart.
They had more interactions because they were living in the same house.
Living together angle: Yeah, I need to share my thought about this angle. Frankly, I couldn't care less when they started living together the first time. It was OK. Sakshi needed a shelter and Manav was ready to provide. Like co-living or PG mates. But when Sakshi and her MIL started living with Manav and Yathu the second time, I just did not like it. There was really no need for that.
But overall I would like to say that Sakshi and Hania were unfortunate characters. They could have much more depth and strength but alas! they were not that much important. As a teacher for a child I liked Hania but as a partner, I think Sakshi was better. Sakshi was terrible as a child counselor
This was such a tiring analysis ....
Edited by umawanderer - 2 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount