Originally posted by: piya2025
If judges were so awesome in their judgment then the rules of eliminating & Top4/bottom 4 or 3 were not changing time to time..There were not a "No elimination" day when it was visible who was the weekest,(Now If I write this,hopefully I wont be called as -Anti Ankan fan n all..)ff they were that fair,that day instead of Swarali & maher,Maher & Ankan would have gone home.(& if they actually judge on "the day's performance)If they were that fair,they would have pointed out Ankan when his acts lack dance instead of praising him as It was the best,If they were actually judging fair Instead of Ankan,Karan was named as the 1st semi-finalist.
I suggest you should read my edited portion. In my entire post I'm only talking about eliminations, and not regarding hypes etc. π As far as the Swarali/Ankan thing is concerned, I think they were almost at par that day, both lacking dance and more high on emotion and drama. Anyone in or out that day, would've been the same thing. IMO, saving Ankan was a better idea, but of course, being saved first among the four danger contestants was definitely wrong. As Rajit was clearly the best among them!Yes,You are right as there is no article Rajit's fans should wait until the epi air & watch the performances but again such spiller actually never turned false,so I afraid that.If the act lack danceing the contestants are definetly not at fault coz they themselves not doing the choreography,So You cant blame one contestant untill he performed worst in that lack of danceing act as well,All contestants acts should be given equal importance,to take care of ,that they dont get eliminated for the bad choreography.lack of dancing but for not dancing well.& If then the judges were actually eliminating them (due to bad dancing) I'd have called them fair judges.I agree with the choreography part. But that is a completely different issue. And I too feel that many contestants have suffered because of it at different points in the competition, and not just Rajit. Infact, I think Rajit and Ankan are the only two lucky ones who have never received poor choreography and always got good concepts! And correct me if I'm recalling wrong, but I think in the senior stages of this competition, the choreography issues have died down. It was only in the initial gala episodes, that we had to bear with this problem!There is no way I can say karan Khanna ,Surjeet Ankan are not good but If I watch the graph of the show,Yes Rajit definatly deserved to be in Top 2 Im not even fond of the word "3"
If you're talking about graph, IMHO, Karan and Surjit are at par, if not above, Rajit. Their graph has always been improving, and with every week they are just getting better and better. π
Originally posted by: Tannistha
maybe rajit didnt deserve to be in the finals, maybe he did, same goes for abhas, maybe he did or maybe he didnt, but that really doesnt stop the judges being biased. Ankan and karan are my favorites and they r in the final, but that doesnt mean the judges were not biased throughout.
I think the dejected fans are just trying to pull up thatpoint, karanp fans realised it when their favorite was at the receiving end, rajit and abhas fans are saying now.truth is, from the beginning,m right from audition and grand audition, i thought farah and Vm are doing a very loose job. specially grand audition was a huge mess. they selected good dancers only to boot them out and take weak dancers like trishala in top 21. while dancers like bhabini, suchna were booted out clearly coz they were older than the average 25 yr age group.back in the gala rounds or whatever, theiur constant praise of meher saving her through average performances, their heralding of saumita,all through her lacklustre dance performances till top 6 was annoying to say the least. whenever some one did something diff, they were thrown in bottom 2. judges cried from the top of their voice classical classical so good, when only kathak was done, someone attempted bharatnatyam and thrown into bottom 3. abhas was thrown in bottom 3 the day he , imo , did the best , his krumping with dabang.they have rated dancers more than they deserve only to realise oh what have we done and throw them out just when their confidence needed boosting.So whatever may the results be, judging in JD has been one steady downward slope.
Originally posted by: -Seraphic-
I suggest you should read my edited portion. In my entire post I'm only talking about eliminations, and not regarding hypes etc. π As far as the Swarali/Ankan thing is concerned, I think they were almost at par that day, both lacking dance and more high on emotion and drama. Anyone in or out that day, would've been the same thing. IMO, saving Ankan was a better idea, but of course, being saved first among the four danger contestants was definitely wrong. As Rajit was clearly the best among them!
Thanks ! I just read that portion,But honestly,that doesn't make any difference to my previous post,Why.. I'm telling you,As you mentioned Swarali & Ankan both were at the same level that day as both of them had some nice concept but lacked dance but _! Swarali got comment that "it had lack of dancing" where Ankan got :It was so good that they wanted more" So if they were actually not bias (They could save Ankan) but yet atleast could give the honest judgement.Now why they saved him & why saving him was a better idea,Coz Ankan has been one of the tough & nicest performer of JD & choosing him over Swarali wasn't really wrong,afterall you cant lose a contestant who is great comparing to the other one,So here it proves that "previous performances does matter"
As for choosing Ankan 1st & Rajit last,See I really didn't think about that but you already said "thats the hype" When It comes to Ankan they do use their tricks :)I agree with the choreography part. But that is a completely different issue. And I too feel that many contestants have suffered because of it at different points in the competition, and not just Rajit. Infact, I think Rajit and Ankan are the only two lucky ones who have never received poor choreography and always got good concepts! And correct me if I'm recalling wrong, but I think in the senior stages of this competition, the choreography issues have died down. It was only in the initial gala episodes, that we had to bear with this problem!
I agree when It comes to Rajit,Yes His concept & Dance were always great may be thats the reason he never had to come @ bottom 4,due to his dance or the choreo but poor Ankan got a lil unlucky here I'd say coz he had the capacity but yet due to lack of dance in some of the acts of his,fellow ended up giving ok-'Kinda done before by him performances.( Not his fault coz whatever given to him,he did perform well)
Umm if choreography was never a issue then why judges gives comment as such that "your performance lacks dance" Its just that from the celeb episode we are not hearing it,isn't it or Im being the OTT one here ?πThere is no way I can say karan Khanna ,Surjeet Ankan are not good but If I watch the graph of the show,Yes Rajit definatly deserved to be in Top 2 Im not even fond of the word "3"
If you're talking about graph, IMHO, Karan and Surjit are at par, if not above, Rajit. Their graph has always been improving, and with every week they are just getting better and better. π
You got me all wrong hereπ³I didn't mean it from the improvement POV,From that way there is hardly anyone who can touch Karan.K & Surjeet,They did reaches the heights of improvement π & I was talking about the graph of all the contestant from the best to the weaker ones.Now Point to be noted- If they could save Ankan neglecting Swarali based on the fact that he's anyday better than her,Then Rajit toh always been one of the best,Isn't it?,KK & Sirji are there coz they have improved but he always given his best,then how come they are now choosing them over him? & how now the previous performances doesn't matter? Is this rule only take its place when it comes to one contestant ?Isn't it a question which make you think atleast for once?
There are so many reality shows which gets the winner who are most improved but then again we all feel bad watching them as winner coz the best had to go out coz of public's poor voting & here coz of judges's judgement .
Originally posted by: piya2025
^Tannistha-Is that you name? I guess yes.
Yesπ
I said again & I repeat Its just choreographer whose duty to give equal dance steps to the performer based on the form but if they doesn't do that how can one put the contestants @ fault..They just prove that they know whom they want as winner so they give them the acts (esp,on such stage when show is receiving its ends)acc to that.
Then How can JD the best show in the world when the judgement itself is so wrong & biased?& also its not about being dejected fans or winners fans side its just that Who find their fav (i'd use this term) in the finale they prefer to keep quite & dont pay attention be it a deserving one going out or not & When someone (which I did actually) Dont find as a veiwer that the deserving one geting what he deserves & speak againts it,one may call me "That contestant fan + so Im saying this..πthere is no end to to the loose ends, crappy choreography, poor judging on saturdays,extremely biased attitude at some contestants, I have been saying it from day one.& Honestly,More than the contestant HR got the limelight, Flim ka bhi promotion kar lia,Music video bhi launch kar lia,Fame bhi milla,TV pe debue bhi ho gaya. But the good contestant got what? - A lil more than "nothing"
well, atleast they stopped the god of dance phrase, god knows how many times it was repeated during the audition and each time i felt like killing them. nothing can be crappier than that.
Edit : Just notice..umm didn't get this bit,care to clarifyπ³
"they have rated dancers more than they deserve only to realise oh what have we done and throw them out just when their confidence needed boosting. "
comment:
p_commentcount