I don't know Aru. Part of me gets really annoyed when I don't see enough dancing (like at the start where Farah, Vaibhavi and Hrithink were just talking at us fo ages). But then, I am quite interested to see the backgrounds of some of the contestants, e.g. Dinanath the 'fruit-wala,' and that girl in Kolkota that supports her family. I think it's really interesting to see that they struggle so much, but are still fantastic dancers.
Having said that, the moment people start crying, I stop admiring their courage. I think that's why Dinanath and the girl in Kolkota stood out to me. Sure, they're aware that they have a tough life, but they're both go-getters. They're not sitting around crying about their lives. The moment the judges told them to dance, all their worries were forgotten.
I think there needs to be a balance. I want to see enough of their lives to see a personal touch to the show, but not so much that it overpowers the dance element of the show and results in purely sympathy votes. The criteria for judging should be based on dance, and not on financial status etc.
But kya kare? The Indian audience, in general, is so senti that these tactics work to garner TRPs. And that's why, as Tannistha and NaDzGirl say, the rona dhona is just part of any Indian reality show.
comment:
p_commentcount