An Atheist's argument: Read this! - Page 2

Originally posted by: S_rocha

I agree those pics was released by Nasa team but there is no prof that that bridge was built by RAMA. One of the reason for this debate is if we go long back to the period when Rama is suppose to exit the geographical feature of earth is different. Now I could not post the picture otherwise i would have posted the map of world of lacks of year back( treta yuga)which was according to scientific theory. In those time the geographical feature of earth was such that Sri lanka and India was attached. so there is no need of building the bridge. Also I said the possible reason for the disagreement between science and religious believe is the limited state of science in which it is currently. The science has no prof of existence neither it has prof for its non-existence. So its better not to combining both as both are two sides of a bank. Any attempt to combine science and religion will result in disagreement. So believe what your conscience says and your faith without bringing it to scientific level😊

see i dont want to argue with u esp !! when the SRILANKAN GOVERNMENT & INDIAN GOVERNAMENT ,NASA is beleiving the existence of LORD RAM,LORD KRISHNA ,then what wud u say abt them ,are they all fools??

When did I say I don't believe in Ram or Krishna. I only said it's inappropriate to look into religious issues through scientific view as both are completely opposite in its reasoning and manipulation. It will always lead to disagreement. I said science has not yet reached to a level where it could prove existence of God e.t.c. And I agree what you said is believed by respective govn of India and Srilanka but it is not believe by science as science always needs some strong proof and reason which is based on its laws to believe. Read carefully what written before jumping to any conclusion.

still i dont want to do any arguement on this !!S-rocha !!!

I agree mostly with s_rocha!

But interesting argument, the Student was really clever 😆

Originally posted by: S_rocha

When did I say I don't believe in Ram or Krishna. I only said it's inappropriate to look into religious issues through scientific view as both are completely opposite in its reasoning and manipulation. It will always lead to disagreement. I said science has not yet reached to a level where it could prove existence of God e.t.c. And I agree what you said is believed by respective govn of India and Srilanka but it is not believe by science as science always needs some strong proof and reason which is based on its laws to believe. Read carefully what written before jumping to any conclusion.

This is not entirely true because the scientists, here in the US, are now doing extensive research on the God particle in the universe. I think u live in India and are not aware of the amazing things scientists are doing here in the US. U should read up on 'string theory of the universe,' 'parallel universe,' 'matrix theory' (which is very close to our religious view of Maya or illusion), and even quantum physics. Google it and see how close these throries are to our own vedanta.

Originally posted by: sattvik

I agree mostly with s_rocha!

But interesting argument, the Student was really clever 😆

Thanks, First time in India-forum i found anyone who agree with me😃

Originally posted by: sita11

still i dont want to do any arguement on this !!S-rocha !!!

Ok its your choice, do as you wish

Originally posted by: Khalrika

This is not entirely true because the scientists, here in the US, are now doing extensive research on the God particle in the universe. I think u live in India and are not aware of the amazing things scientists are doing here in the US. U should read up on 'string theory of the universe,' 'parallel universe,' 'matrix theory' (which is very close to our religious view of Maya or illusion), and even quantum physics. Google it and see how close these throries are to our own vedanta.

See I am also a student of physics so I do have knowledge of what you are referring and yes I live in India but it does not apply i am unaware of these issues. The string theory of Einsten is yet a theory not a low, einsten was working on it during his last days and left it Incomplete so the amazing theory of einsten is yet incomplete and need mathematical foundation which was not achieved till today. The attempt have been made to relate these theories mentioned by you to what written on scriptures. But its relating attempt i.e one deliberately try to relate, but no strong foundation has been made possible from which these could be related. they tried to relate the verses of old sanskrit text with mordern research, some time they successfully explained but at the other time when cross questioned failed because of lack of strong foundation. For example string theory says that there is a fundamental particle negligible in size, are thought to be excitation modes of elementary strings. However, the strings in string theory are floating in space-time. Nonetheless, they have tension. and the same is written in one of our scripture that whole of the universe woven in string. so people went on comparing the theory with scripture. The same goes to parallel universe and matrix theory. People tried and found few verses and related those to this but still lacks strong foundation as i mentioned. But as far as Quantum physics is concerned the scripture has completely failed to prove even a part of it. This is one of thing questioned while relating science with scriptures that why hindu scripture is unable to describe quantum world. Anyways what i was saying that science although is doing extensive research in supernatural phenomenon but is still in its preleminary stage while the progress of it in these field are concern. It has yet to go a long way when it could possible accept or reject the things such as existence of GOD, Life after death e.t.c. I am saying that today science has no proof to accept this in the same way it has no proof to reject this and it a long way to have proof either to accept or to reject. I hope you understood my point😊

Originally posted by: S_rocha

Thanks, First time in India-forum i found anyone who agree with me😃

YEAH !!! becaz saatvik doesnt knows what kind of pathetic threads u hv made earlier on RAMAYAN forum for lord RAM & for LORD KRISHNA at kahani humare mahabharat ki forum u were banned also from IF becaz of this & ur r back on IF with a new ID & again having 40% warning levels

Amazing article lalitha di👏, only Einsten could have answered like this, Great mind with , Great thought😃


Evolution theory is what against creation as per our scripture and many other scripture such as Christianity. So our hindu saits and also many other has his own reason not to believe in this theory. Even few Great scientist was in opposite to this theory and Einsten was one of them. Einsten was agaist this theory of Evolution. Nevertheless this is very interesting to read. Einsten has intelligently answered all the question of his Atheist teacher. 👏