Page
of
1Shyam, 1st of all thanks for making this post.I mean hats off to u for watching it n then analysing it. This show has become so stupid n boring n pathetic n beyond tolerance level.
I had guessed Shanaya's truth will come out in the last episode lets see whether it is 2day or on the final D-day.I will sum up the last 2 episodes.U have already mentioned the technical stupidity of Monday's episode.
Padma apologising to Sharda ...uff.
Ok, so Shanaya knows Sharda the best- she did say that she wanted to send Karan to jail n Sharda Ma obliged by saying 'jo hukum mere Shanaya akka'.
This Shanaya- Sakshi thing is so childish. Both of them r giving big big dialogues to each other. Why isn't Sak telling anything to Karan, she told him abt her BP pills, so why not this time.Why this unnecessary misunderstanding between them.
Sharda loves Shanaya so much, that she told Lat to leave Diya n stay with baby Shanaya.This time she doesn't mind Lat not spending quality time with her daughter, again her double standard thing.
n what was that - Sakshi finds Karan selfish bcoz he dared to think of making his own pehchaan😕.( I was very disappointed with her).
She tells him he can't see anybody's love for him
Suresh loves him by telling him that he does not have any business sense n is worthless
Sharda loves him by sending him to jail n
Latika loves him by stealing his presentation n always finding faults in all his business decisions, by always reminding him that she is a far greater business woman than him.
I think Sak only feels bad when someone belittles her innocent, bestest MIL. She does not seem to mind when her husband gets insulted.
Even in the precap Lat was complaining to Suresh that Karan took a business decision on his own( doesn't he have a right, he is also a partner of Sharda Textiles) n that is the time when Karan snapped back n got slapped by Lat( this time around she is his elder sis). I won't be surprised if Sak once again tells Karan how selfish he is that he spoiled her Sharda Ma's happy moment by quarreling with Lat.
comment:
p_commentcount