Originally posted by: Geremania
Faisal is almost 15 years old now. Next year he would have been eligible for DID4. He always stood out right from day 1 with a bigger physique. It was shameful enough to allow him to compete with kids as little as 6 yr (Jeet) to 12 yr (Rohan). Not only did he have the unfair advantage of being PHYSICALLY and MENTALLY stronger than the little kids, he was also given unfair moral support from the judges constantly. And still Saumya, Rohan and even Jeet were equal, even better than him in terms of genuine dance talent.
To make him win "LITTLE" masters is like allowing Sonu Nigam to compete in and win Indian Idol. Why even carry out the competition and morally degrade the other kids confidence when Geeta maaa had chosen her winner in the auditions itself? π€’
And OM at 2nd? I wouldnt even go there... Its like they want to prove season 1 and 2 skippers are better no matter how painfully UNORIGINAL and PLAGIARIZING they are...
Word Count: 1
Originally posted by: tannipartner
I would go by what is officially stated, since if we go in the debate or actual age and what Zee claims, there can be a lot of trouble with a lot of peopleπ. Faizal does not look more than 13, his voice and all, so i don't think his age is fudged.
He is well within age limit.BUt whether his winning was justified or not? Another story, he definitely was good and worthy like other 4, but we all have seen how geeta have favored him. I personally do not think him winning is justified. Saumya acc to me was the strongest.
comment:
p_commentcount