Posted:
they want 12 seats of Nitish but not TMC ka seats ? 🤣🤣.
I think Didi should demand PM post as she has more seats than Nitish. And ofc it won’t matter as they still don’t get it. INDIA bloc lost the election. 🤣🤣🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
they want 12 seats of Nitish but not TMC ka seats ? 🤣🤣.
I think Didi should demand PM post as she has more seats than Nitish. And ofc it won’t matter as they still don’t get it. INDIA bloc lost the election. 🤣🤣🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Still not gonna trust them
Nitish Kumar do not have that much leverage also as his Government is standing with support of BJP.
Tmc ki seat nahi chahiye Indi ko 🤔bahut seats hai yaar
Originally posted by: Palak2812
Wanted to post this again
But one thing I will give it to News Channels and I actually got to know from that.
In the Editorial of any major newspaper, you won't find any comments against AAP.
AAP has made such a huge network where the Newspapers, especially the Editorial page, can't print against them.
This has been happening from over 2 years.
You can print and write shit against Modi and Rahul, but never against Kejri and his party.
&
This is something that needs to be worried about.
Put it up on the previous thread, but that got closed because it was hitting 150, so putting it up here again.
There's a nice, easy solution to this that's overlooked.
Ban government ads in both TV channels and newspapers, and no government folks (be it state/central/local municipality) should be allowed to attend conclaves of any kind hosted by the owners of channels.
Do this, and there'll be no incentive or carrot of any kind from the government to the papers, and they can keep their editorial integrity intact. If a platform got ads from any government, how would you expect their reporting to stay neutral?
Bold is also the reason that from a common sense POV, if you have A channel aligned to X party and B channel to Y, one should take A's words a little more seriously when Y is in power and vice versa.
It's not about one statement but the overall treatment. Now, Nadda ji won't be needed by the party while RSS will have the last laugh.Originally posted by: RamAayeHain
Wow, nadda ji ne hi statement diya tha na they don't need RSS
Maybe nahi bolna chahiye tha
Indeed. I've been noticing it. The ridiculous amounts of ad money flowing in has helped pAAP censor the media. Their nonsensical and irrelevant full page ads appear in multiple states...like unwanted spam mails and messages.Originally posted by: Palak2812
Wanted to post this again
But one thing I will give it to News Channels and I actually got to know from that.
In the Editorial of any major newspaper, you won't find any comments against AAP.
AAP has made such a huge network where the Newspapers, especially the Editorial page, can't print against them.
This has been happening from over 2 years.
You can print and write shit against Modi and Rahul, but never against Kejri and his party.
&
This is something that needs to be worried about.
Originally posted by: Wistfulness
Indeed. I've been noticing it. The ridiculous amounts of ad money flowing in has helped pAAP censor the media. Their nonsensical and irrelevant full page ads appear in multiple states...like unwanted spam mails and messages.
AAP without even having seats and was when just in Delhi they used to spend wayy more than UP in ads.
| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RamAayeHain | 12 | 767 | ||
| Palak2812 | 28 | 747 | ||
| mnx12 | 1.4k | 53.7k | ||
| mnx12 | 1.6k | 48.7k | ||
| kchaims | 19 | 969 |
comment:
p_commentcount