Originally posted by: somewhereover
Yes she got too personal so she's wrong. Also her line/dialogue is so bad in that scene. It seems like he did really physically hurt in that scene though. i felt like he could have conveyed his point without getting physical. I really like KW, he has so much charisma but not sure the ultra angry man style suits him. The irritated / annoyed Adi is much more likable.
It seems like the week 1 episodes were shot a while back as a pilot week and this week's episode seem to be more recently shot.
I am actually really liking his ultra angry young man avatar and KW is doing extremely well, but what is frustrating and unacceptable that his anger goes physical with Ginni, he's not completely emotionally detached and the proof of it is the deep love he has for his mother, Daarji and care, if not deep for his younger Siblings/cousins which was evident when Gurleen's younger sister pleaded him to tolerate harnaaz for Gurleen's sake he faked a smile reluctantly though but he did, infact he's emotionally unstable but that doesn't give him the right to manhandle a female. His mother's absence torments him and evil memories with father haunts him and yet I find truth in Amber's words of him being a looser and is nothing without Singh surname to which he says he's his mother's son than why the arrogance??? If he's striving hard to become something and is OK without the Singh surname why he keeps reminding Ginni about her 'Auqaat'??? If you look or notice closely, Ginni would have had a better and stable financial position if not for her loans because she actually is the owner of the dhaba and is running it all these years to feed her family, but Adi doesn't own anything and when Daarji announces to put business in Adi's name both he and Amber were reluctant so he actually doesn't own anything and is actually begging for something so he can stand on something and call it is his own and ginni wants to continue his father's legacy to run the dhaba successfully and despite of all her financial problems she has something but Adi has nothing so I don't understand the logic of auqaat and haisayet dialogues every time by Adi I think it is not applicable here, not in this scenario if he was only being stubborn I could have understood it but I don't understand the reason of this arrogance and we should all admit it is a very big loophole in this story, ofcourse it is not Kw's fault but this should have been considered before the scenes were shot.
Next time if Adi reminds ginni of her Auqaat she should remind him about his auqaat. This would be more impactfull than manhandling and forced trip and falls scenes.
A.
comment:
p_commentcount