IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack - Netflix Series Review - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

98

Views

7.1k

Users

24

Likes

138

Frequent Posters

Wistfulness thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 1 months ago
#41

Originally posted by: TorinoPasta

Yes, the hijackers did use Hindu aliases. So that is accurate. But nowhere does the show tell us what their real names were. In fact, the Government of India has publicly named them: Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Shakir, Mistri Zahoor Ibrahim, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, and Ibrahim Athar.

The show does not even tell us that these men were Pakistanis and that, a couple of days into the hijack, Indian intelligence agencies had identified them as Pakistani operatives and even knew which parts of Pakistan they came from.

Instead, the show seeks vaguely and unconvincingly to link the hijackers to Afghanistan and even to Al Qaeda, suggesting that the hijacking was part of some grand plan hatched by Osama bin Laden and that, if ISI was involved, then it was in a very junior position.

This is a straight-out lie. The hijacking was an ISI operation, part of the covert war that Pakistan has waged against India for decades.

https://theprint.in/opinion/sharp-edge/netflixs-ic-814-is-an-expensive-pr-job-for-the-isi-shows-raw-torturing-civilians/2250744/

Thank you so much for drilling some sense here. Nobody has an issue with the Hindu aliases because that's factual. The problem is only with exploiting the code names and never once mentioning the actual names. Further, watering down the pakistani isi terrorism is awful. More so when it's well known that one of the released terrorists, monster masood azhar, went on to carry major terror attacks against India. Further, this hijack wasn't the first attempt to free him.

If a series of 26/11 is made tomorrow, terror apologists like anubhav sinha will say it's okay to call Kasab Samir Dinesh Chaudhuri from Bengaluru because that's the fake identity he was prepared to die with.

Edited by Wistfulness - 1 months ago
oyebollywood thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 1 months ago
#42

IC 814 Survivor says hijackers were called bhola shankar

Following Netflix's 'IC 814' controversy, Pooja Kataria, a survivor of the IC-814 Kandahar hijacking says: "There were 5 terrorists on board the aircraft. Half an hour after the flight took off the terrorists declared that the flight was hijacked. We were nervous. We were asked to keep our heads down. We didn't even know we were in Kandahar. People were having panic attacks, so one of the terrorists named 'Burger', who had a friendly approach, helped people, and made them play 'Antakshari'.


"A terrorist called 'Doctor' gave a lot of speeches on converting to Islam. The other terrorists had code names called 'Bhola' & 'Shankar'. They were calling each other that. The series was made for entertainment purposes, I don't know why people are getting offended...Maybe the (Indian) govt could have tried a commando attack on the aircraft in Amritsar, then then it could not have flown outside India."


Under pressure from the government, Netflix India on Tuesday said it has included the real and code names of the hijackers of the Indian Airlines aircraft depicted in the web series IC814: The Kandahar Hijack.


The web series had triggered a row after a section of viewers objected to the humane projection of terrorists and reference to their Hindu code names, contending that distortion of real identities of hijackers amounted to misrepresentation of historical events.


Information and Broadcasting Secretary Sanjay Jaju summoned the Netflix India's contend head, Monika Shergill, to convey the government's strong disapproval of the depiction of certain elements in the web series

https://news.rediff.com/commentary/2024/sep/04/ic814-survivor-hijackers-were-called-bhola-shankar/48394695f35810ba2486982e3b22393f

Edited by oyebollywood - 1 months ago
Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 1 months ago
#43

Another clip of the conference

https://youtu.be/K36znmMge9g?si=jBObm-bMoDC2sP-L

Kyahikahoon thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants 2 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 1 months ago
#44

Who even in their right mind expected something better from this bunch of people? M not even giving it a try.

Just listen to their line of thought

https://x.com/wokeflix_/status/1831179852856410130?s=46

https://x.com/iankursingh/status/1831033452382359910?s=46

Even greater surprise is this lady.

https://x.com/theskindoctor13/status/1831186258913018256?s=46

Kyahikahoon thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants 2 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 1 months ago
#45

Originally posted by: TorinoPasta

Yes, the hijackers did use Hindu aliases. So that is accurate. But nowhere does the show tell us what their real names were. In fact, the Government of India has publicly named them: Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Shakir, Mistri Zahoor Ibrahim, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, and Ibrahim Athar.

The show does not even tell us that these men were Pakistanis and that, a couple of days into the hijack, Indian intelligence agencies had identified them as Pakistani operatives and even knew which parts of Pakistan they came from.

Instead, the show seeks vaguely and unconvincingly to link the hijackers to Afghanistan and even to Al Qaeda, suggesting that the hijacking was part of some grand plan hatched by Osama bin Laden and that, if ISI was involved, then it was in a very junior position.

This is a straight-out lie. The hijacking was an ISI operation, part of the covert war that Pakistan has waged against India for decades.

https://theprint.in/opinion/sharp-edge/netflixs-ic-814-is-an-expensive-pr-job-for-the-isi-shows-raw-torturing-civilians/2250744/

Rightly said. Movies r forever. When we watch movies made decades ago in the 40s or 50s we don’t go around checking facts. Today’s movies will also be watched by tomorrow’s generations. For us this is recent history, we can fact check n correct..but unless the movie is portrayed as purely fiction next gens will take that as fact.

And this isnt a one off thing. Happened with Negi ji’s character in Chak De.

Happened in Jai Bheem.
In 1993, a tribal man named Rajakannu was tortured and killed by SI Anthonysamy, a Christian. Yet, the 2021 movie Jai Bheem, based on this incident, changed Anthonysamy to Gurumoorthy, a Hindu.

Kyahikahoon thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants 2 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 1 months ago
#48

https://x.com/sjlazars/status/1830518011683385803?s=46

This guy lost his family in Kanishka bombings.

Read n watch what he has to say

https://x.com/adityarajkaul/status/1830989850582847536?s=46

Palak2812 thumbnail
Posted: 1 months ago
#50

Originally posted by: Kyahikahoon

Rightly said. Movies r forever. When we watch movies made decades ago in the 40s or 50s we don’t go around checking facts. Today’s movies will also be watched by tomorrow’s generations. For us this is recent history, we can fact check n correct..but unless the movie is portrayed as purely fiction next gens will take that as fact.

And this isnt a one off thing. Happened with Negi ji’s character in Chak De.

Happened in Jai Bheem.
In 1993, a tribal man named Rajakannu was tortured and killed by SI Anthonysamy, a Christian. Yet, the 2021 movie Jai Bheem, based on this incident, changed Anthonysamy to Gurumoorthy, a Hindu.

Also Survivors said terrorists were trying to convert them.

But according to this series, Terrorists were hindus.

It is typical hypocrite behavior of BW will show so called facts which will vilify Hindus for no faults of them.

But will use artistic freedom in other things they will show.

&

People still defend it bcoz as always Hating a political party and blaming hindus for no reason is okay and should be promoted.


If the real names and real story was shown then this same bunch of people would be crying Islamophobia, would be saying hate is spreading, propaganda and other nonsense eveb with facts.

But abhi koyi problem nahi hain, rather have problem that people are calling out the nonsense shown.

Top