Originally posted by: snatch
i believe ur issue is communal. if not , my answer is i am not a spokesperson of the ruling party. i believe the government will take necessary precautions before taking any decisions which will affect the people of dweep and india.
When did I say anything about religion or community? Believe it or not, not everyone wakes up and checks whatsapp to look for messages that begin and end with religion this and religion that. Religion, religion, religion. I do not make my social or economic decisions based on religion.
Lakshdweep is a vulnerable environmental zone that is predicted by scientists to sink to the bottom of the sea. IIT has done research on it. Commercialisation for tourism as was proposed two years earlier would quicken its sinking. That is the scientific consensus and has been so for many years. I gave you links to where scientists have articulated so. Only you could find something 'communal' in science.
Btw Pondicherry went through something similar in the 80s-90s and its local population barely has any control over its resources. Much of the land is owned by commercial establishment. Lakshdweep is even more ecologically vulnerable than Puducherry.
People of Lakshdweep are people of India. Lakshdweep is India. It does not deserve to sink. If people love India, they would not want Lakshdweep to sink for the sake of private companies to make profit. I did not get to know of Lakshdweep's existence a day ago unlike many celebs.
You believe that Govt. would do something to protect Lakshdweep's ecology. I asked you to substantiate what do you think should be done to conserve it ot has been done to conserve it.
How is that communal?
Anyhow.
I do not respect people who bring up religion anywhere they are unable to substantiate their claims.
I would ask you to not project on me
Sayonara.
Edited by Blueeeee - 10 months ago
comment:
p_commentcount