Originally posted by: Mahisa_22
I don't think you understood what I said. Sure, context matters. But baring your vagina and nipples without context is sexual, right? Here in this photo, Sonam is deliberately striking erotic poses, baring cleavage, and thighs which have no relation to announcing pregnancy. There's no rocket science here that's so hard to comprehend.
But there is context, right - it's a pregnancy announcement. People do all sorts of pregnancy announcements from nude and barely clothed to not even featuring themselves but having chalkboard announcements or ultrasound photos.
I, personally, don't find pregnancy announcements erotic or titillating. Even if the woman is fully nude, my mind thinks that this isn't to arouse me, but it's a woman owning and celebrating her body that is going to be creating and sustaining a future person.
But that's just me. Can someone get titillated by images like this? Of course. Are they wrong to get aroused? No. It's a natural response. Even I can falter despite awareness that it's not for me. We all get aroused at times without intending it. People can get aroused by the most ridiculous things like a tree or a rock because of their shape and structure. Some people have a pregnancy fetish and can be aroused by even a fully clothed woman cradling a pregnant belly.
So, I don't think it is reasonable to police and control how other people own or express their bodies. I don't think it is fair to blame people either. As grown-ups, we must realize that some things are meant to be sexual and some are not - understand the time and place and try our best to be mature about it.
comment:
p_commentcount