Originally posted by: Sharpener
Katrina, Kriti are great options for these action films. Vaani is here only because of Aditya Chopra.
Kriti would look too young for SRK..remember Dilwale.
Katrina and SRK simply didn't click at the BO.Bang Bang should have done well.Both were perfect.Somehow it fizzled..and the director was Sid Malhotra
She is decent actress. I don't find her bad. She suits certain roles. I liked her in war.
Originally posted by: TheMinion
Isn't YRF contract of 3 movies? This lady seems to have signed a life-long contract!
not for free
Kriti would look too young for SRK..remember Dilwale.
Katrina and SRK simply didn't click at the BO.Bang Bang should have done well.Both were perfect.Somehow it fizzled..and the director was Sid Malhotra
LOL..kriti is 31 and Vaani 32..
Vaani is a good dancer, she is only getting flowerpot roles these days
she didn’t need nose surgery
Yes and Shraddha is 34..Pari is 32..these girls and Kriti have acted opposite Varun .Not sure how they would look opp Shah,or if they were in the running for Pathan/Fighter.Vaani may have been ,because of War..
Varun,Tiger,Kartik,Rajkummar,Sushant-the regular male co-stars of these actresses..are more than 20 years younger than the senior actors.Kriti opp Akki was a disaster..what was she even thinking?
I totally agree with you2 here. Vani is Deepika's deserved successor. Both have the similar qualities and appeal.
comment:
p_commentcount