Shraddha Kapoor - poor or good filmography?

pathaka thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 3 years ago
#1

Extremely poor..,.vanilla basically

She has “naam ke vaste” hits

And the reasons those films were hits was more so music, action , other performances (haider) than her

Not a single strong performance on her part or where she drove the film to a success

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

1.8k

Users

11

Likes

13

Frequent Posters

infinity101 thumbnail
Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail Anniversary 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#2

She is same in all her movies and hasn't improved a bit.Yet to see a "good performance" from her.

Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#3

Her performances aren't that great, but if anyone from Alia's generation, was as popular as her or commercially successful it was her.

Shraddha is like mini Katrina of last decade. Their was a time when every young actor, from Aditya Roy, Varun Dhawan, Sidharth Malhotra, Tiger, all had their biggest hits with her.

She may not be crowd puller on her own, but with a good packaging, she has better appeal than others of her generation, apart from Alia.

bollyqueen0 thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#4

Shraddha with how weak her acting is has done VERY well for herself. She now has a huge fanbase, she's very adored for being sweet, she's still beautiful, she's always busy, etc.


I don't think she needs to bounce back. She never went anywhere. She will continue to get work 🥳

TrustNo1 thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#5

Not even eligible to be rated

Talis thumbnail
Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Anniversary 4 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: MujheMaarjaneDo

Her performances aren't that great, but if anyone from Alia's generation, was as popular as her or commercially successful it was her.

Shraddha is like mini Katrina of last decade. Their was a time when every young actor, from Aditya Roy, Varun Dhawan, Sidharth Malhotra, Tiger, all had their biggest hits with her.

She may not be crowd puller on her own, but with a good packaging, she has better appeal than others of her generation, apart from Alia.


She's 34, a year younger than Deepika, a year older than Anushka and Taapsee - and supposedly (hah) the same age as Kangana. She's mainly been paired with the blandest and weakest leading men and she doesn't have one standout performance.

Edited by Talis - 3 years ago
Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Talis


She's 34, a year younger than Deepika, a year older than Anushka and Taapsee - and supposedly (hah) the same age as Kangana. She's mainly been paired with the blandest and weakest leading men and she doesn't have one standout performance.


Abbey timeline of their career, not her age wise.

1123190 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#8

Only thing I appreciate about Shraddha is she didn't do any movie with older actors like Khans, Kumar, Devgn.

hotchoco thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#9

What filmography? I don't even remember any of her movies. She's like one of those B-grade actresses who shows up in random things when you need a bland pretty girl.

Chasa thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#10

She is horrible as an actress. Im kinda surprised how she survived so far. Because she had ample opportunities yet couldn't make much out of it. She has acted decent only in Stree and Chichhore. In the rest , she is just forgettable.

Top