she was 17 almost 18 when they dated. She wasn't 15 and he was 26 not 50 please moralist.Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_
Wrong, she was 15, 16 at most, underage, sleeping with an underage girl is statutory rape, and the disgusting rapist kept her in his home.
What kind of 27 year old man, that too a film actor, who has easy access to women, hooks up with a 15 year old kid, and keeps her in his home, a sick perverted rapist.
somy stated that she was 17 when they begin a relationship but she know him from when she was 16 and come. In india. They begun a relationship after one year that she was in indiaOriginally posted by: Heisenberg17_
Wrong, she was 15, 16 at most, underage, sleeping with an underage girl is statutory rape, and the disgusting rapist kept her in his home.
What kind of 27 year old man, that too a film actor, who has easy access to women, hooks up with a 15 year old kid, and keeps her in his home, a sick perverted rapist.
Lol. Srk cheated gauri for 6 years just that pryanka would never admitting like somy does because pryanka doesn't need publicity and it will be a bad publicity for her because srk was and still is a married man. For this reason she would never say anything about the hot affair its not film its reality srk pryanka stopped to be friends from 2017 and he wasn't invited at her marriage lthe same for Akshay Kumar. Salman went even if there were a little rift after pryanka left bharat but still salman went at her marriage reception its evident srk pryanka had a long affair no one is saint please
grow up 17years girl with a 26 years guy how this is pedo rapist use the words more appropriately in the most part of the world sexual consent begin at 16.
There is a word called grooming.
He met at her 15/16. They were officially together when she was 17, but both admitted they were cheating before. So yeah, likely at 16.
Even if she was 17, what he did will be considered grooming and sex with a minor.
Age of consent in India is 18. Not 17. So statutory rape.
I pray few people are *grown* enough to be okay with an adult grooming and having sex with a minor.
Btw, didn't you claim a couple of pages ago that he probably saw them as a parent-child relationship which caused him to punish her? If that's the case, then how is having sex with the same child okay?
no the first period of her stay in india she wasn't with Salman. She didn't know him they just see each other after she went to meet a famous photographer salman have seen her pics and like it and after some time they called her for a film bulund They begin a relationship in 1993 she was 17 and the age was 16 that time in the 90s just in 2013 in india was raised at 18. But in Europe for example is 16. In many country. yes I said he felt she was young and immature he was used to sangeeta that was 5 years his seniors so probably after some time he felt she was immature and need some protection an discipline. bust still for me you can't slap your gf or your bf etc It's wrong. It was wrong the abuse absolutely but I don't consider pedhopilie a 17 year with a 26 years old. It's weird if he was 50 yes. so srk was a pedhopile because he fell for. Gauri and begun a relationship when she was 14and he was 18?Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
There is a word called grooming.
He met at her 15/16. They were officially together when she was 17, but both admitted they were cheating before. So yeah, likely at 16.
Even if she was 17, what he did will be considered grooming and sex with a minor.
Age of consent in India is 18. Not 17. So statutory rape.
I pray few people are *grown* enough to be okay with an adult grooming and having sex with a minor.
Btw, didn't you claim a couple of pages ago that he probably saw them as a parent-child relationship which caused him to punish her? If that's the case, then how is having sex with the same child okay?
no the first period of her stay in india she wasn't with Salman. She didn't know him they just see each other after she went to meet a famous photographer salman have seen her pics and like it and after some time they called her for a film bulund They begin a relationship in 1993 she was 17 and the age was 16 that time in the 90s just in 2013 in india was raised at 18. But in Europe for example is 16. In many country. yes I said he felt she was young and immature he was used to sangeeta that was 5 years his seniors so probably after some time he felt she was immature and need some protection an discipline. bust still for me you can't slap your gf or your bf etc It's wrong. It was wrong the abuse absolutely but I don't consider pedhopilie a 17 year with a 26 years old. It's weird if he was 50 yes. so srk was a pedhopile because he fell for. Gauri and begun a relationship when she was 14and he was 18?
What you're doing now is justifying the grooming of a teenager by an adult man who had already been in relationships and was even engaged to be married.
What you're doing now is using legal terms to justify what anyone would rightly see as sexual abuse of a minor. 8 to 12 years girls used to be married off to 24 years old men back in ancient days. Does that make it all right today? Most people can see it as wrong.
What you did in prior posts is justify his physical abuse as a parent punishing a child which is exactly what we have been saying here. He was an adult, and she was a child. Except your argument is that it was the case during the physical abuse, but the difference somehow magically vanished during the sexual abuse.
Interesting how you bring up SRK. As far as I know, they were 14 and 18 when they met. She lived with her family at her own home. They started living together after marriage in 1991. She would've been 21. There have been no news about SRK getting violent with women. Yes, with journos who created problems in his life and could've caused the end of his marriage. But not with any woman in his life.
Somy, a 16 year old, was living in Salman's home, in a sexual relationship with him. He physically abused her.
Do you seriously not see the difference?
Anyway, murderers and rapists who are actually behind bars have women fanmailing them. So why not Salman who got away with both? Apparently, criminality is excusable when it comes with money and fame.
Thanks for sharing this video. But its very brave of somy to pick her broken pieces of heart and put her anguish in making things better for society. i am glad she is running a real not for profit organisation not the fraud and fake one like salmans being human. She seems like a strong women but did some stupid things when she was young.
Lol. Srk cheated gauri for 6 years just that pryanka would never admitting like somy does because pryanka doesn't need publicity and it will be a bad publicity for her because srk was and still is a married man.
May coz that never happened, its ur fictional show
For this reason she would never say anything about the hot affair its not film its reality srk pryanka stopped to be friends from 2017
SRK still follow Prinyanka on Twitter and big deal in Bollywood all friendships are temporary
and he wasn't invited at her marriage lthe same for Akshay Kumar.
If not inviting consider affair many were their not invited, Amitabh Bachchan dosent invited half of industry for Abhi-Ash marriage so they all had affair with Big B or Abi B.
Salman went even if there were a little rift after pryanka left bharat but still salman went at her marriage reception
Ya but Priyanka and her hubby were late so they hadn't greet each other did that consider affair too in your world
its evident srk pryanka had a long affair no one is saint please
Their is no evidence only your delusions
[\QUOTE]
then in Europe are criminal because sexual consent begin at 16? But please what a moralist and Srk didn't groom gauri? How do you when they had sex? She was 14 when they begun dating so he's a pedophile too by your logic.. She wasn't living at salman home she lived. With them after sangeeta salman split in 1994 before she lived with her mother in an hotel in Mumbai you had always double standard. Srk could groom a 14 years girl right you have double standardOriginally posted by: HearMeRoar
What you're doing now is justifying the grooming of a teenager by an adult man who had already been in relationships and was even engaged to be married.
What you're doing now is using legal terms to justify what anyone would rightly see as sexual abuse of a minor. 8 to 12 years girls used to be married off to 24 years old men back in ancient days. Does that make it all right today? Most people can see it as wrong.
What you did in prior posts is justify his physical abuse as a parent punishing a child which is exactly what we have been saying here. He was an adult, and she was a child. Except your argument is that it was the case during the physical abuse, but the difference somehow magically vanished during the sexual abuse.
Interesting how you bring up SRK. As far as I know, they were 14 and 18 when they met. She lived with her family at her own home. They started living together after marriage in 1991. She would've been 21. There have been no news about SRK getting violent with women. Yes, with journos who created problems in his life and could've caused the end of his marriage. But not with any woman in his life.
Somy, a 16 year old, was living in Salman's home, in a sexual relationship with him. He physically abused her.
Do you seriously not see the difference?
Anyway, murderers and rapists who are actually behind bars have women fanmailing them. So why not Salman who got away with both? Apparently, criminality is excusable when it comes with money and fame.
| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sparkling_Wine | 5 | 586 | ||
| oyebollywood | 3 | 586 | ||
| beena_jon | 10 | 1k | ||
| beena_jon | 2 | 365 | ||
| Socklet | 3 | 327 |
comment:
p_commentcount