Originally posted by: coldbrew
You've been defending nepotism since day 1 and now that the case has flown the focus on to Rhea, it was very jarring to read your post ascertaining nepotism's lack of involvement in his case. I'm saying WE DON'T KNOW THAT YET! The full picture is not there yet and the possibilities are endless--that includes the solidarity of bollywood and the character assassination he faced! So, no you don't get to say "okay nepotism is not a fault here"... let me repeat myself here--we don't know that YET.
As for floating useless theories goes, you're also equally a part of the "theories" cuz there are two sides to every story. If there have been people angry with the obvious groupism in b'wood, you have also spent a significant time rubbishing them without knowing the full picture. So you can ditch the holier than thou attitude and the rest of your "told ya so" sermons too.
The way I see it there are broadly 2 different groups:
Justice for SSR v/s
Anti- Justice for SSR
The first group, which as a disclaimer includes me, feel that staying silent will most likely lead to injustice to SSR. This group believes SSR was wronged. If it was a suicide, he was driven towards it. If it was a murder there could be gross injustice (minutes into the incident Mumbai Police declared this as suicide). They also feel that the people who knowingly hurt SSR (e.g. fake blinds, if-any snatched projects) should also be called out publicly.
The second group believes the Justice for SSR bandwagon should shut up. There was no foul play involved. It was a simple case of suicide, where nobody is responsible. The Justice for SSR is sensationalizing a simple case. Neither the Bollywood nepotism-mafia nor Rhea should be accused of any wrongdoing.
Now people have selected their groups, and fighting for/against it. In between few people switch sides. But overall that division stays.
comment:
p_commentcount