Are Vicky Kaushal and Malavika Mohanan the new hot couple - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

49

Views

12.3k

Users

18

Likes

33

Frequent Posters

Zeal17 thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago
#41

Seriously.. i suggested a portmanteau of 2 names they were thinking... originally they had one 4 letter and 5 letter name..and i made a 7 letter name. 😆

AllThatCritique thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

We will never know will we? Ranveer isn’t in it so why “if ranveer was in it” just like how “if Ranveer was in KS “ drama. 🤦🏼‍♀️ Maybe Jim himself was in contention and lost the role hence the “joke” and maybe it has nothing to do with Ranveer.

So if representation is not a joke then the makers should very well take a Parsi actor and not Vicky. Jim then stands correct going by your own logic.

But if representation is not a joke,then he shouldn't say he was joking about it in the first place. His hypocrisy was called out and that's why he backtracked. And I can still question if he would play this card if his friend was involved since he was the one in contention the most. He played Malik Kafur,a hindu-turned-Muslim in Padmavaat. I understand fictional characters but Malik was an historical character so that opens a can of worms too.

1017676 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

But if representation is not a joke,then he shouldn't say he was joking about it in the first place. His hypocrisy was called out and that's why he backtracked. And I can still question if he would play this card if his friend was involved since he was the one in contention the most. He played Malik Kafur,a hindu-turned-Muslim in Padmavaat. I understand fictional characters but Malik was an historical character so that opens a can of worms too.

But by your logic, joke or not he is correct then. He is a Parsi and that a Parsi actor in the industry not doing a Parsi role is something he might have problem with if representation is the issue. He himself later stated that he has done other non Parsi roles.

Yup of course, that is exactly how competitive world of BW works. 🤦🏼‍♀️ Ranveer’s supposed friend who is an actor himself rallies around to take Ranveer’s battle. Let’s drag Ranveer ..

AllThatCritique thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

But by your logic, joke or not he is correct then. He is a Parsi and that a Parsi actor in the industry not doing a Parsi role is something he might have problem with if representation is the issue. He himself later stated that he has done other non Parsi roles.

Yup of course, that is exactly how competitive world of BW works. 🤦🏼‍♀️ Ranveer’s supposed friend who is an actor himself rallies around to take Ranveer’s battle. Let’s drag Ranveer ..

Yeah he's correct about representation. But he is taking on other minority roles. Then he should have not said yes to Malik Kafur since he's taking a Muslim man's role then. And Ranveer was in contention for the role the most hence I brought him up. That's that. If there was news of Jim being in contention I wouldn't have bought Ranveer in. What's with the 'dragging Ranveer for nothing' agenda? Lol. There's a reason I brought him up.

1017676 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Yeah he's correct about representation. But he is taking on other minority roles. Then he should have not said yes to Malik Kafur since he's taking a Muslim man's role then. And Ranveer was in contention for the role the most hence I brought him up. That's that. If there was news of Jim being in contention I wouldn't have bought Ranveer in. What's with the 'dragging Ranveer for nothing' agenda? Lol. There's a reason I brought him up.

Because Ranveer being in contention for the role or not has nothing to do with why and what Jim commented. If Deepika had then bringing Ranveer might make sense otherwise it is nothing but dragging “lol” .

Ya he is an actor so he has done muslim roles just like Vicky. Him being a Parsi and an actor might have made him comment which was unnecessary.

AllThatCritique thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

Because Ranveer being in contention for the role or not has nothing to do with why and what Jim commented. If Deepika had then bringing Ranveer might make sense otherwise it is nothing but dragging “lol” .

Ya he is an actor so he has done muslim roles just like Vicky. Him being a Parsi and an actor might have made him comment which was unnecessary.

Questioning whether Jim's hypocritical stand would pertain to his friend who's name was most in contention for a minority role isnt dragging Ranveer in any way at all. I can definitely question him giving passes to other people while he makes statements like these. The 'would he have' well he didn't have a problem with playing minority roles and supporting his friend playing minority roles so my question still stands if things would be different if it wasn't Vicky. And I don't get this washing Ranveer's hands off a friendship with Jim. They are friends.

GumGum thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#48

He tried to say Vicky did a white face. But white facing is not an issue for the armchair activists, so no one appreciated Jim's tweet. That made Jim say, Imma Jokinga, so that he doesn't look like a sore loser.

GumGum thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#50


Sridevi married her rakhi brother toh yeh dono rakhi bhai behane bhi date kar sakte hai.

Top