Originally posted by: VintageWine
Both are good Vicky is more versatile tho.
The problem with RK is he is stuck with that rockstar / tamasha characters. When he tries something different it doesn't go well. He has this image of a charmer & lost soul stuck with him. Another thing about him is he imitates well be it raj kapoor or Sally or Sanju.Vicky was great in masaan, zuban, Raman, raazii etc. They're quiet different...Its kinda sad he's getting recognised now. ( after razi n sanj) if he wouldn't have starred along these big budget movies I doubt there would have been a comparison made.
Originally posted by: VintageWine
Both are good Vicky is more versatile tho.
The problem with RK is he is stuck with that rockstar / tamasha characters. When he tries something different it doesn't go well. He has this image of a charmer & lost soul stuck with him. Another thing about him is he imitates well be it raj kapoor or Sally or Sanju.Vicky was great in masaan, zuban, Raman, raazii etc. They're quiet different...Its kinda sad he's getting recognised now. ( after razi n sanj) if he wouldn't have starred along these big budget movies I doubt there would have been a comparison made.
Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais
^^Oh Lord! How can 2 siblings be THIS talented?!
Originally posted by: rogerrocks
Jim Sharbh is so annoying. I liked him in Neerja but he was unbearable in Sanju. At least Vicky has proved himself over multiple films like Masaan, Raman Raghav, Raazi and Sanju 😆
vicky also isnt a lead actor. He was a supporting actor in all of his movies.Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais
^^Sarbh is never a lead actor & the comparison clearly calls for a lead to be pitched against the other successful male lead, lol. Sarbh isn't forgotten at all though! He was so good in PD & I felt like killing him in Sanju. 😆 Vicky is probably shades better though imo
comment:
p_commentcount