Rajkumar Hirani on Sanju:I told Sanju we won't glorify him and he was - Page 3

Originally posted by: Zee_RK

Still better than glorifying barbaric ruler and mass suicide 😆 reference there was Beauty and the Beast 🤔 here every moral code should be touched 😆

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Sanjay Dutt is a living person who has some really serious charges against him...He is one of those poor little rich guys who has had too much time, money and power to flaunt around and make the choices he has made...If the movie even remotely shows him as a victim, it will be wrong at so many levels...We have to remember that Ranbir Kapoor has nothing to do with Sanjay's life...As far as the movie is concerned, Ranbir as usual seemed to have delivered yet another impeccable performance but the criticism at large is towards the theme of the movie which is totally understandable...

Judgements should be made after the movie release. If its glorification of his crimes then everyone has the right to say. Nothing from the movie was shown except from 30 sec small glimpses which doesnt give away the movie. Anyway I am sensible enough to separate Ranbir's portrayal from real life of Sanjay Dutt.

However, the irony is people who are shouting glorification chants are the fans of a certain actor who himself glorified a barbaric ruler in cartoonish way. That ruler was a real person just like sanjay is. I think you failed to see the pattern my friend. Also some people would actually spend money on an actor and will watch his movie who is convicted (say Sanjay Dutt or Salman Khan) but raise their eyebrows if movie is made on them with their consent 😆 Announce a movie of Deepika and Ranveer with Sanjay and they will rush to theatres. Why dont boycott him plainly then? So the objections are not related to Sanjay's life in any case. Problem is because Ranbir is there so lets do the unnecessary bashing and make yourself look stupid 😆

Ofcourse it has nothing to do with neutrals who are not interested. But lack of interest is shown just by ignoring the topic and by not asking the same question rhetorically at each and every thread acting like sore losers 😆

but is he telling the truth?

Originally posted by: Zee_RK

Still better than glorifying barbaric ruler and mass suicide 😆 reference there was Beauty and the Beast 🤔 here every moral code should be touched 😆

No in that film the barbaric ruler was antagonist.

In this film the protagonist is a suspected terrorist. Making jokes about guns

Originally posted by: RecklessDemon

but is he telling the truth?

These people would put know the truth if they slept with it 😆

Originally posted by: Zee_RK

A million people are definitely interested in! 1 million views and counting, positive response from the audience who is paying from their own pockets. But cant understand your rhetorical question. Hirani wanted to make it he made it those who want to see it, will go... how can you dictate what other people should do with their money 😆

Hirani is best director in Bollywood...dont expect khali bali type gutter trash from him...in the end it will be good movie.

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Hirani is best director in Bollywood...dont expect khali bali type gutter trash from him...in the end it will be good movie.

Its kindda like doubting a class batsman...form can fluctuate but class i permanent..those who are claiming its a parody..its a joke..its clownish...well if someone is going to play sanjay dutt it is going to look like sanjay dutt...what a stupid argument

at least he served the punishment.. he is better than people in position of power who play with lives of innocents all over the world and are popular leaders...

i am fed of bigotry...

But there is difference in playing Sanjay Dutt the man

An playing Sanjay Dutt playing Munnabhai 😆

Originally posted by: Ogreatone

No in that film the barbaric ruler was antagonist.

In this film the protagonist is a suspected terrorist. Making jokes about guns

Originally posted by: HawasKaPujari

Seriously, he was the antagonist, that was loud and clear..

For months now, people have been complaining about Khilji's villain act because it's "too negative", he was made out to be a barbarian but he was "actually civilized", Khilji was shown so wild and brutal because SLB wanted to appease Rajputs and "anti-Muslim agenda", blah blah.

Now suddenly it's the complete opposite and the issue is he was glorified? What the..😆😆

People supporting conflicting arguments will cause them to spontaneously combust 😆