Originally posted by: MrsKhan
Who knows what happened as far as technicalities in the Ram Leela? That Nawaz was going to participate in it was publicized for several days. Why wasnt a role reserved for him only the organizers know or Nawaz knows if it is true. If we now start asking people to remain indoors because someone has been accused of something then most of our politicians would be sitting at home. A person is innocent till proven guilty as per law. And that Shiv Sena didnt support the stand of this local leader is also out. So make an educated guess who was jumping the gun and who was right or wrong and who was covering up with excuses about some case or replacing someone else.
Like I said issue is more to do with single screens. Its them who asked their members to boycott fearing violence and not multiplexes. And what can I say about Ajay? You are supporting him so you can speak better for him.
Blue: I agree. And your point is?
If there are so many technicalities in the Ramleela issue then why even compare it with MNS issue where the case is pretty clear? π
only the single screens in MH. what about the rest of the states. besides if ADHM is fearing loss of single screes then eevn Shivay should be afraid of loss of multiplex earnings because of that threat of glasses in multiplexes being costly by MNS. Who told you I'm supporting Ajay? π
My point is public is free to have an opinion about the actions of any public personality whether it's Pm or KJo or kashyap. why have objections when people, according to their individual sensibilities, decide to criticize kashyap, Bhatts or Kjo for their actions? are ARTISTS, who are public figures, beyond criticism too? Even cricketers, also public figures, suffer the flak of peoples' angst when they lose important matches but they never crib about being soft targets like these Artists do...π
Edited by NathuPyare - 8 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount