Karan Johar and Mukesh Bhatt will meet Rajnath Singh. - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

103

Views

4.8k

Users

28

Likes

179

Frequent Posters

Sabhayata thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: MrsKhan


I think this tweet sums up the entire hypocrisy around people condemning a BW producer for trying to make sure his work is not targeted.

dorku @Dorkstar

10rs ka recharge atak jaata hai toh Sunil Bharti Mittal ko tag karke rant kar dete hain lekin koi apne crores ko nuksaan ke liye chu na kare



Lets put ourselves in Karan's shoes and see.

We are common people.We tomorrow some hooligans with no legal rights whatsoever threaten my business in which i have invested time and money.What will i do sit down and bow down to the requests of these hooligans?

No i will try to do what is in my power to protect my business in a legal way.Go and meet the police and meet any other influential person i know who can help me.These are all legal ways.Karan is doing the same .So what is wrong in this?We would we do the same.


princessunara thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 8 years ago
#62
@OP - did u have any for the poor guy to lose it? πŸ˜†
Sabhayata thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: patipatni

People here decidong who should contact who. What Karan sees fit for his movie, he will do and HM saw his request worthy so gave him appointment. People here are like we know about everything better than everyone else. HM did wrong to give appointment, KJo did wrong to seek appointment. Only MNS was right to give threats because its a political party who has every right to protest


Exactly

MNS is threatening violence ,threatening to not release a movie which they have no legal right to do.And all Karan is doing is taking measures to ensure that the violence doesn't happen.Ok maybe gong to HM wasn't required but still Karan is only taking extra measures to ensure violence doesn't happen.So how is he wrong.
TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#64

But that Nawaz was going to participate was publicized in advance. Now we dont know if the SS guy let his threats also known in advance. And why should he take action against Nawaz for the dowry case? Its already with the police who is taking action. To me it seemed like a way to deflect attention when he realized even his own party wont support him.

I dont think the issue with multiplex but its with single screens not screening. There Shivay has a free run so Ajay is not saying anything. But instead of being selfish he must come out and support ADHM. Today it is ADHM for this reason tomorrow it could be his film for another reason too.

Why should citizens decide? Its up to the PM. But that doesnt stop citizens from deciding and they already are deciding on it based on what they support-peaceful protests or hooliganism.
1013440 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#65

Originally posted by: MrsKhan


But that Nawaz was going to participate was publicized in advance. Now we dont know if the SS guy let his threats also known in advance. And why should he take action against Nawaz for the dowry case? Its already with the police who is taking action. To me it seemed like a way to deflect attention when he realized even his own party wont support him.

I dont think the issue with multiplex but its with single screens not screening. There Shivay has a free run so Ajay is not saying anything. But instead of being selfish he must come out and support ADHM. Today it is ADHM for this reason tomorrow it could be his film for another reason too.

Why should citizens decide? Its up to the PM. But that doesnt stop citizens from deciding and they already are deciding on it based on what they support-peaceful protests or hooliganism.


If the threats were not known in advance then u cannot compare the Nawaz - Ramleela case with the ADHM-MNS. Plus if nawaz's participation was publicized in advance then why wasn't a role reserved for him to play? why did they have to consider replacing another guy in ramleela for nawaz, at the very last moment? furthermore just because police is taking action against a person in dowry case it doesn't mean that the concerned person is freed of those charges. until the person is proven innocent many people may have objections to such a person playing a part in a socio-religious function like Ramleela.

In single screens of Maharashtra only Shivay may have a free run but what abt the multiplexes? wahan to gehu (ADHM) ke saath saath ghun (Shivay) bhi pisega. Why should Ajay come out in support of KJO. If anything he should be complaining that because of ADHM even his movie will be affected in the multiplexes...but still he is #RELAXED . besides Ajay has already made his stand clear about Pak artists working in India.

Citizens do have the power to decide, speak or protest on any issue. when citizens can decide who will be the PM why can't they decide whetherthe PM should be burdened with petty issues like a movie release or not...especially when he has other big issues to deal with at the moment.
Edited by NathuPyare - 8 years ago
hasini009 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: MrsKhan


And gained 4.8 lakh crore the next day. Thats how the stock markets work. So your point is?


my point is post what I know/want/feel and move on. if others agree to disagree with me, no probs, they can do itπŸ˜†
TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: hasini009


my point is post what I know/want/feel and move on. if others agree to disagree with me, no probs, they can do itπŸ˜†


Except that you have been refusing to move on and post the same thing again and again in every thread. πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
MercurialMedusa thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#68
Highlight was Mukesh bhatt saying they'll never work with Pakistani artists again πŸ˜†
TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#70

Originally posted by: NathuPyare


If the threats were not known in advance then u cannot compare the Nawaz - Ramleela case with the ADHM-MNS. Plus if nawaz's participation was publicized in advance then why wasn't a role reserved for him to play? why did they have to consider replacing another guy in ramleela for nawaz, at the very last moment? furthermore just because police is taking action against a person in dowry case it doesn't mean that the concerned person is freed of those charges. until the person is proven innocent many people may have objections to such a person playing a part in a socio-religious function like Ramleela.

In single screens of Maharashtra only Shivay may have a free run but what abt the multiplexes? wahan to gehu (ADHM) ke saath saath ghun (Shivay) bhi pisega. Why should Ajay come out in support of KJO. If anything he should be complaining that because of ADHM even his movie will be affected in the multiplexes...but still he is #RELAXED . besides Ajay has already made his stand clear about Pak artists working in India.

Citizens do have the power to decide, speak or protest on any issue. when citizens can decide who will be the PM why can't they decide whetherthe PM should be burdened with petty issues like a movie release or not...especially when he has other big issues to deal with at the moment.


Who knows what happened as far as technicalities in the Ram Leela? That Nawaz was going to participate in it was publicized for several days. Why wasnt a role reserved for him only the organizers know or Nawaz knows if it is true. If we now start asking people to remain indoors because someone has been accused of something then most of our politicians would be sitting at home. A person is innocent till proven guilty as per law. And that Shiv Sena didnt support the stand of this local leader is also out. So make an educated guess who was jumping the gun and who was right or wrong and who was covering up with excuses about some case or replacing someone else.
Like I said issue is more to do with single screens. Its them who asked their members to boycott fearing violence and not multiplexes. And what can I say about Ajay? You are supporting him so you can speak better for him.
Blue: I agree. And your point is?

Top