Urmila Matondkar - Why wasn't she as successful as Madhuri or Sridevi? - Page 6

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

love_karanabha

@love_karanabha

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#51

Urmila was awesome in the movies she had her own unique beauty and charm ! Great actress one of my favourites !

Miss her wish she would be on social sites for her fans atleast

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#52

Originally posted by: Sridevil
Urmila deserved Best Actress in 2003/4 instead of Preity Zinta/Rani Mukerji...
She did some great work during the period 2003-2005.

True.

But some seek to project it to 90s and rewrite 90s as well. 😉

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1021044

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#53

Urmila is most underrated actress. I just live her dancing.

Quote

QueenExpression

@QueenExpression

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: lhcj21
Urmila was a good actress, but sometimes I thought she was also too sexy. Madhuri and Sridevi were classy actresses who could do classical dance. Urmila was a good actress, but she was also kind of a sex symbol. Plus she didn't have the classical dancing skills that Madhuri and Sridevi had.

I was also thinking the same thing..Maduri and Sridevi were very family friendly actresses. Even their sexy scenes weren't over done or uncomfortable to watch with family..like Maduri and Sridevi rain songs ect. But Urmila, I recall saying what the hell thats a bit too much for a Bollywood film when she was dancing in Rangeela I think that was the film. Also, the fact that Maduei was the total package might have to do with her being a superstar and not Urmila. I find Maduri better looking and better dancer than Urmila. Acting wise Urmila might be better..but Maduri isn't too far behind she was a decent enough actress.

Edited by QueenExpression - 9 years ago

Quote

UrmilaFanForeva

@UrmilaFanForeva

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#55

m really happy OMG...

i do believe she might not be everyone's major fav...but its so good to see various amazing reactions towards her now...on the whole i can truly say here tht majority believes that she is a good actress that does matter...👍🏼

i am seeing the same flame in KANGANA...this time :D i hope she manage to pull off what urmila couldn't since kangana seems to be getting successful in those films who showcase herself as a performer and not a second fiddle to the male actor !! 😃

mean while, i really wish BHAGWAAN JI Ramu ki khopdi ko sadbuddhi di and he makes a comeback with URMILA. atleast I love their combo, i am a huge fan of thriller movies anyways, they lure me much harder than romantic ones : )

Quote

568470

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#56

Originally posted by: Neetu_Singh121
m really happy OMG...
i do believe she might not be everyone's major fav...but its so good to see various amazing reactions towards her now...on the whole i can truly say here tht majority believes that she is a good actress that does matter...👍🏼

i am seeing the same flame in KANGANA...this time :D i hope she manage to pull off what urmila couldn't since kangana seems to be getting successful in those films who showcase herself as a performer and not a second fiddle to the male actor !! 😃

mean while, i really wish BHAGWAAN JI Ramu ki khopdi ko sadbuddhi di and he makes a comeback with URMILA. atleast I love their combo, i am a huge fan of thriller movies anyways, they lure me much harder than romantic ones : )

Absolutely agree with this!😃

Love both Kangana and Urmila! But sadly Urmila's work got unnoticed :(

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#57

Kangana is making it because she is doing family friendly films and not dark or sleazy stuff.

Second fiddle to males...umm...Narsimha, Dillagi, Kunwara, Kudrat Shaka laka boom boom, Rascals, anyone? 😉

But I am glad Kangana hits are atleast family audience friendly. She seems to have learnt from her own and previous actresses failures. Unlike... 😉

Quote

UrmilaFanForeva

@UrmilaFanForeva

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#58

yeah some asses hv got really burnt and turned to ashes, tht's why they been beating one tune like hell but to their dismay, any one's hardly listening... ~~~ !!! 😆

Quote

UrmilaFanForeva

@UrmilaFanForeva

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: evildesire

Absolutely agree with this!😃
Love both Kangana and Urmila! But sadly Urmila's work got unnoticed :(

u guys hv noticed...atleast we can be happy with tht .. dats all matters 😉

kudos to the topic maker...muaahh...

you hv succeeded in pulling off a historic topic indeed ⭐️

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#60

Who needs to burn when topic itself is self explanatory? 😆

Cribbing why she was NOT sucessful. 😉

IF allows wish fulfillment in form of topics to all.

That's why only here any also-ran gets hyped as superstar or underrated legend.

Quote

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7

Urmila Matondkar

Sridevi

topics	author	replies	views	reply
Urmila Matondkar Mohsin Headed For Divorce 2 3 4 oyebollywood 31 4.2k	oyebollywood	31	4.2k	1 months ago gixevik491 >
Find yourself first: Urmila Bekind 2 303	Bekind	2	303	a month ago Shaitan-Haiwan >
Was Sridevi really offered a role in Jurassic Park (1993)? Sparkling_Wine 2 348	Sparkling_Wine	2	348	1 months ago Sparkling_Wine >
Khel Khel Mein Director Thinks His Movie Is Successful! Shaitan-Haiwan 6 517	Shaitan-Haiwan	6	517	2 months ago TigersGirl >
Why did Amitabh, Vinod, Rishi, etc all come with Sridevi? fazgostoso 5 609	fazgostoso	5	609	2 months ago forza >

Urmila Matondkar - Why wasn't she as successful as Madhuri or Sridevi? - Page 6

Related Topics