Urmila Matondkar - Why wasn't she as successful as Madhuri or Sridevi? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

64

Views

17.1k

Users

29

Likes

125

Frequent Posters

UrmilaFanForeva thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Sanjana4Rajeev

I think the main problem was when she was doing way too many movies with RGV. Despite her performance was critically acclaimed , but it wasn't really successful in the box office. She was a complete package..good looks, great dancing skills,and excellent acting skills.


She makes me speechless even today with films like Ek Haseena Thi, Pyaar Tune Kya Kiya, Bhoot and Pinjar. These films were her best performance in her careerπŸ‘πŸ‘



urmm...why u guys forget KAUN ...this film is liked by too many people...they should release it again...shall definitely be a hit now ...πŸ˜ƒ


Edited by Neetu_Singh121 - 9 years ago
UrmilaFanForeva thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf


DTPH wasn't that great of a film. Nor was there any great acting in it. I honestly dont even know how karishma won the national award for it? Than again Judai was kinda of dumb to? Sridevi basically sells her hubby to Urmila? πŸ˜• But Judai had better acting IMO.


don't worry, at this moment, we would find mostly all 90's movies a bit stupid. that's the nature of law ... πŸ˜†
MalahFirangi thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#23
she start sex in very young but her selection for gay RGV is very stupid this guy eat's her every thing even carrier
Pirated_Fun thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#24
She is one of my favorites ...Her choice of roles have been superb .I love her movies more than Sri or Madhuri
UrmilaFanForeva thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: Lighthearted

she start sex in very young but her selection for gay RGV is very stupid this guy eat's her every thing even carrier


what do u mean by she started sex... :/ as far as i can remember Rangeela didn't hv any sex, yes there were some amazing sexy numbers and they hve been the finest in indian cinema, we don't even to get to see such dances even today ! no why do they would feel the need to do a sexy dance, when they can make out with the heroes themselves... in Rangeela she was bold but that was beautiful !

and RGV didn't eat her career...in fact he should be thankful to her, whatever the films he made after her straight bombed and he lost himself...of course we are so sexiest...we would always compare the women in lesser. films or no films, atleast Urmila is in a much better condition than Ramu is πŸ˜†
Edited by Neetu_Singh121 - 9 years ago
tootyfrooty- thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#26
urmila's acticg sucks ,does overacting
Padfoot_Prongs thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: SaMaiRa.


I also loved her in Kaun, Rangeela, Satya, Lajja, Janam Samjha Karo, etc...
It's weird cause she is a great actress, looks good, and dances well... She is younger than Madhuri (she is 41 and Madhuri is 48) but she debuted BEFORE Madhuri in 1980 whereas Madhuri debuted after her in 1984... Yet Madhuri became an over-night sensation whereas Urmila, despite having all the qualities, didn't end up reaching the superstar status.

She was not a part of Lajja.
she did gud movies but she was also considered as overacting ki dukaan. she was gud in pinjar and other movies but she was bad in so many movies.
UrmilaFanForeva thumbnail
Anniversary 9 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: MissBahanji

She was not a part of Lajja.

she did gud movies but she was also considered as overacting ki dukaan. she was gud in pinjar and other movies but she was bad in so many movies.


every actress does bad films...so what ~ Was madhuri so perfect ... just watch YAARANA ...she was indeed terribleπŸ˜† and so as sridevi in many moviesπŸ˜†. just like Sachin can't hit a six on every ball ... an actress' calibre doesn't go down by few films... !
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#29
This forum! πŸ˜†

Any also ran or glam doll of past is an underrated talent?

Urmila did not want to be a performer. Look at her earlier films!

She very much wanted to be a commercial heroine.

Rangeela is normal now but it was considered too bold back then. Its songs were called vulgar due to Urmila's clothes, picturisation and her expressions.

Another amazing thing is to loosely use words like classics! Kaun, EHT, etc are classics?!

No Urmila film is a classic.

Sridevi has too much versatility in her filmography so please do not even compare her to Urmila. Even 1 Sadma is enough to trump Urmila's entire career.

Urmila was just a sex symbol and once even reduced to item girl. Just few good performances later, when she was past by her sell date, don't make her underrated performer.

If she wanted to be a performer she wouldn't choose Narsimha, Aflatoon, Kudrat, Hum tumpe marte hain, Kunwara and many more rubbish films.

Complete package is not just beauty, talent, dance etc. It is also giving hits and also doing roles people relate to.

Sridevi, MD, Kajol, Lolo all balanced with such roles. That's why they succeeded.

Urmila never did family oriented films which were in vogue then.

Tomorrow one can call Bipasha an underrated performer too. πŸ˜† Though she is also just a sex symbol with 1 or 2 nice performances.

Urmila has been profiled in film magazines and national magazines only under sex in Hindi cinema topics.

She never fit the ideal heroine mould.

Seeing this thread I feel Sonam has hope then. Tomorrow she can hope to be called complete package and amazing performer with just 1 hit and 3 good performances.

So much career reinterpretation and revisionism goes on here!
Edited by atominis - 9 years ago
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#30
BTW

It is not luck due to which Lolo got DTPH while Urmila got Judaai.

She was rising to the top with hits like Jeet, Saajan Chale Sasural and Raja Hindustani in 1996. YRF would take a top star anyday!

In 1997 also Lolo had 3 hits with Hero No 1, Judwaa and DTPH.

Urmila was left to bask in glory of Rangeela only. Forget Sri and MD, Lolo and Kajol were far ahead of her.

Karisma and Kajol were the only ones who were attracting best offers from mid 90s.

Karisma is the only one (debut from 90s) who matched steps with a dancer like Govinda without hesitation.

May I know what was the verdict of Urmila the performer's films with Govinda? Kunwara and Hum Tumpe Marte hain? πŸ˜‰ What was verdict of Jaanam samjha karo with Salman?

It was no surprise she got Judaai and that too supporting role to Sri who was going to retire then!

Even Sonali had more sense then to try to do family oriented roles. That's why people remember her as Preeti from HSSH!
Top