This forum! π
Any also ran or glam doll of past is an underrated talent?
Urmila did not want to be a performer. Look at her earlier films!
She very much wanted to be a commercial heroine.
Rangeela is normal now but it was considered too bold back then. Its songs were called vulgar due to Urmila's clothes, picturisation and her expressions.
Another amazing thing is to loosely use words like classics! Kaun, EHT, etc are classics?!
No Urmila film is a classic.
Sridevi has too much versatility in her filmography so please do not even compare her to Urmila. Even 1 Sadma is enough to trump Urmila's entire career.
Urmila was just a sex symbol and once even reduced to item girl. Just few good performances later, when she was past by her sell date, don't make her underrated performer.
If she wanted to be a performer she wouldn't choose Narsimha, Aflatoon, Kudrat, Hum tumpe marte hain, Kunwara and many more rubbish films.
Complete package is not just beauty, talent, dance etc. It is also giving hits and also doing roles people relate to.
Sridevi, MD, Kajol, Lolo all balanced with such roles. That's why they succeeded.
Urmila never did family oriented films which were in vogue then.
Tomorrow one can call Bipasha an underrated performer too. π Though she is also just a sex symbol with 1 or 2 nice performances.
Urmila has been profiled in film magazines and national magazines only under sex in Hindi cinema topics.
She never fit the ideal heroine mould.
Seeing this thread I feel Sonam has hope then. Tomorrow she can hope to be called complete package and amazing performer with just 1 hit and 3 good performances.
So much career reinterpretation and revisionism goes on here!
Edited by atominis - 9 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount