Originally posted by: Picasso9
Benefit of doubt can be given precisely at the point when task ended. Thereafter they had plenty of opportunity to hear from Lopa and from Mona (sanchalak) before becoming judge and jury. So that benefit of doubt excuse does not hold water after a day and before filming of WKW. They chose NOT TO LISTEN to Lopa when she explained. Plus sanchalak Mona fell in their bhed chaal instead of explaining both days details. Mona could have confirmed exactly what Lopa said but they wanted to score false points on the maa topic.
Plenty of time to hear from Lopa... Perhaps... but did Lopa actually give a firm point that her father or grandma were brought in the picture?
That is true, that they could've taken the time to listen. However it's very easy to conclude that. Perhaps they were not willing enough to be patient to someone who's been overly emotional and went through quite an angry rant section for several hours, could've assumed it could've been another rant. Benefit of doubt isn't an excuse, it's called being lenient.
In the end, due to the fact that they weren't aware of what actually transpired still gives them benefit of doubt. I agree that Mona at the very least could've explained at the very most.
I do understand your position, and I understand your view, but it's not as clear cut as one would think.
comment:
p_commentcount