Originally posted by: BullsEye777
The good part about Gaurav is that he is not delusional nor becomes defensive when told he is wrong - his expression showed that he understood Lopa's point.
+1
you hit bullseye with that comment, BullsEye777
some think gaurav meant 4 major incidents occurred in lopa's absence, and that these were not restricted to just aggression. actually, all 4 were nothing more than little skirmishes/examples of aggression between manveer and gaurav.
if there was anything more to it, gaurav - being the upright and honest person that he shows himself to be - would have raised it then and there in front of salman. why wouldn't he? after all, he was trying to prove that lopa was unfair.
so lopa was as honest and fair as she could have been under those circumstances. and there was nothing more she could have done other than take the opinion of rival manveer and observer sahil [sahil and manveer disliking each other could have influenced sahil's opinion there, but it didn't]
comment:
p_commentcount